![]() |
Question on Segers Ramblin Gamblin Man |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Author | |
BillCahill ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 13 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 19 August 2007 at 1:52pm |
I picked up what appears to be a Capitol promo 45 but I'm trying to determine it's actual origins.
It has the correct number and B side. Mono. It has the typical Capitol design of the period, yellow label with black print. But under the "NOT FOR SALE" print, it says, "Produced by" HIDEOUT RECORDS AND DISTRIBUTORS INC". Was that also on the stock copies? The reason I ask is that the artist for this promo is Bob Seger, not the "Bob Seger System". If it is a radio copy then maybe this 45 was originally released to radio as Bob Seger, and then changed later. Or, it's not a radio copy, but some promo made up for a state fair or something later when he dropped "The System". Or, it's a boot and I got tricked. It's mono. Trail says: 45-59078-F1 Is Hideout on the stock? Does anybody have a promo with System on it? Any clue as to whether or not this is an original or something else? Bill |
|
![]() |
|
Pat Downey ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 01 October 2003 Status: Offline Points: 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My dj copy is identical to the one you are describing Bill. The flip side of mine is "Tales Of Lucy Blue". Capitol 45's in those days had a serrated ridge surrounding the yellow label and mine has that serrated ridge. I doubt a boot would have the serrated ridge.
Edited by Pat Downey |
|
![]() |
|
Gary Mack ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 06 February 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Bill,
You apparently have a real promo copy, likely the earliest one. My stock 45 has the "Hideout" credit line and Bob Seger System. The matrix number is different though; mine reads 45-59078-P1, the P suggesting a later pressing, which would make sense. And Pat's comment about the serrated edge around the label is real proof that yours is a Capitol pressing. GM |
|
![]() |
|
BillCahill ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 13 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes it has the serrated edge. Thanks for the help guys, not a bad purchase for a buck!
|
|
![]() |
|
PaulEschen ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 28 December 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Just to divert the theme of this post a little bit, I've tried to fold down the
version of this song from the CD Ramblin' Gamblin' Man to see if I could get a mono version close to the original 45 version. The version on the CD (and the tan-colored re-issue 45 for that matter) is electronically rechanneled for stereo, but it sounds like they simply put the treble in one channel, and the bass in the other. When I did a simple fold-down on my computer, and added just a bit of high-end boost, I think it sounds pretty darn close. Has anyone else tried this? |
|
![]() |
|
Todd Ireland ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Does anyone have any idea why a Billboard Top 20 smash like "Ramblin' Gamblin' Man", released by a major artist (Bob Seger) on a major label (Capitol) has been next to impossible to find on CD? I mean, for crying out loud, if you can even find a copy of the lone long out-of-print CD containing the song, you not only can expect to shell out over $100 for it, but you also settle for listening to the hit in awful electronically rechanneled stereo!
If "Ramblin' Gamblin' Man" was owned by some other label, I could possibly understand how licensing issues could prevent the song from further CD reissue. But it was released on Capitol just like all of Seger's numerous other hits. So what gives with the song's conspicuous absence on CD, especially in genuine mono or stereo? I was fortunate to see Seger in concert last year here in Pittsburgh and it was a very delightful suprise when he performed "Ramblin' Gamblin' Man" during the show! Evidently, he still thinks enough of the song to perform it in concert nearly 30 years after it's release. So why does it continue to be so elusive in digital? What's the story, Morning Glory? Edited by Todd Ireland |
|
![]() |
|
AndrewChouffi ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 24 September 2005 Status: Offline Points: 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Bob Seger's long-time manager (and some-times record producer) Ed "Punch" Andrews controls (possibly owns) the Seger masters; Capitol can't release/repackage them without Punch's directives.
Andy |
|
![]() |
|
Todd Ireland ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for the clarification, Andrew. But this only begs the question... Why is "Punch" Andrews being so stingy about reissuing "Ramblin' Gamblin' Man" on CD?
|
|
![]() |
|
AndrewChouffi ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 24 September 2005 Status: Offline Points: 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Todd,
I of course can't answer your question for "Punch", but I suspect the answer lies somewhere in this... It seems in the music business when one talented, busy, wealthy individual has control over licensing, it's just not a priority to him (e.g. Allen Klein, Phil Spector, Dave Clark, Bruce Springsteen). Who knows, now that "Punch" has retired from Kid Rock's managerial position to specifically concentrate on Seger's international touring, there may be some attention turned to Seger's releases. (I believe Seger is the only major artist that has never had a 'box-set' released.) Andy |
|
![]() |
|
Hykker ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 30 October 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A couple other thoughts:
Could there be licensing/tape ownership issues here? I don't think Seger was continuously signed to Capitol. RGM was on Capitol, but I have a couple early 70s singles of his on small, obscure labels, then by mid-decade he was back with Capitol. Could it be that "Punch" doesn't own/control the tapes to this? Another (somewhat related) thought. The only copy I have of RGM is the Capitol reissue single in muddy-tinny fake stereo. It sounds awful. This would also point to maybe a missing early-generation tape or the multitracks (recorded in '68...there must have been multis at one time). |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |