![]() |
the animals house of the rising sun |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | |
edtop40 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 10 May 2016 at 2:45pm |
my commercial 45 for the animals song 'the house of the
rising sun' issued as mgm 13264 lists a run time on the label as 2:58 but actually runs 3:01...the run out groove info is 'K 13264 64-xy645'....i post this because the db states that the run time of the 45 is 2:58....can anyone else confirm their commercial 45's run time? |
|
edtop40
|
|
![]() |
|
jimct ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ed, I own 3 commercial copies of the MGM 13264 45, and my cleanest
copy exactly mimics your deadwax info. The reason I never reported my timing results during my 1964 db songs 45 research sweep (listed 2:58; actual 3:00) a while back is that the :02 difference I found didn't meet Pat's longstanding reporting policy of a minimum of a :03 second difference. But after 10 years + of being here on the board with you, good buddy, I know very well that you're not at all a fan of this policy of Pat's, and have always basically ignored it. To each his own, I say! As for me, I've always tried to keep my personal opinion on the issue 100% out of it, and simply abide by Pat's policy on Pat's forum. Ed, I will grant you that my actual 45 timing *almost* reaches (3:01), but both my old Post-It Note and new re-timing for you today both came out to (3:00.8). Man, the word "truncated" doesn't seem nearly adequate enough to describe this 45's fade. The first evidence I could hear for the start of the fade was at the (2:56) mark. From there, the remaining (:04) seconds of the fade is way too quick and severe, hurts my ears, and can only be described as being extremely poorly done. But that's besides the point. Neither of my other two stock 45 copies (deadwax info of "K13264 64 XY 645-5" and "K13264 64 XY 645-8") quite got to the (3:01) mark, either. They came out at (3:00.8) and (3:00.9), respectively. Edited by jimct |
|
![]() |
|
MMathews ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 18 August 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Interesting. My own dub of our stock copy times at
exactly (2:59.5). I don't have the 45 handy, but I'll get the deadwax# at work tomorrow. Jim, I thought that :03 sec policy was in regard to database entries, not the chat board. I don't recall clearly tho, it's been years! I feel ya about this 45's abrupt fade, but for me that's great as compared to the first 2 edits. Those hurt my ears much worse. Since this was such a monster hit, I'd assume there were several pressings of this during its chart run and I'll bet there are small differences in pitch causing these slight time differences. MM |
|
![]() |
|
jimct ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes, Mark, you're 100% correct about the :03 second policy being in
regard to db entries, not the chat board. But the primary reason I either start or respond to existing threads with timing details is because I've noticed that Pat's db has no current timing notation attached to it, and I have discovered that my copy's listed/actual timing details meet his :03 reporting criteria. For many years Pat has kindly added my details to his db. While there are surely some forum readers that have interest in :01 & :02 second L/A differences, I know others who have no interest in them at all. Therefore, I've always been mindful of not "inundating" the forum with the very large # of these smaller time differences - especially if Pat isn't going to note the info in his db. That was my reason for bringing that point up in the first place, in response to Ed. So he would know why I hadn't started a song thread for it years ago. |
|
![]() |
|
Jody Thornton ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 23 May 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So wait for just a sec. At this moment, I'm listening to that old "24 Electryfying Hits" compilation LP from 1970, which has an abrupt sounding edit of this song on it. Is that edit for real? The intro, keyboard solo and the ending all have edits. And there appears to be some heavy wow and flutter on the tape master. ***** Edit **** I just went and listened to a YouTube vid of the 45-rpm disc. Ouch - that's awful, but still a different edit than I just listened to on the turntable. House of the Rising Sun (Edited) Edited by Jody Thornton |
|
Cheers,
Jody Thornton (Richmond Hill, Ontario) |
|
![]() |
|
KentT ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 25 May 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This tune in the USA version was edited so severely, I
suspect a Stihl Farm Boss Chainsaw was used. When that British Hits comp on MGM was issued, hearing the full version was a major epiphany. Edited by KentT |
|
I turn up the good and turn down the bad!
|
|
![]() |
|
Tom Daly ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 20 October 2017 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Having worked in the industry, playing time of analog recordings can vary widely, especially when we're talking about the drive systems that were used in analog tape machines of the day with A/C synchronous motors and variations in line frequency. Add to the mix that "House of the Rising Sun" was recorded in the UK on 50 Hz tape machines. The UK tapes wouldn't play at exactly the same speed on US decks due to our use of 60 Hz synchronous motors. There would always be tiny variations, even between two decks of the same make and model in the same country! Given that, and that synchronous A/C motors were also what was common until Japanese turntables, both belt and direct drive switched to using DC servo controlled motors and eventually quartz locked PLL drive systems in the best turntables, any record would play for one length on one turntable and be off by a few seconds on another. Today, playing times are generally calculated by the time of a song's file used to make a CD master, including the silence before and after the song. On anything I've ever mastered, take the length of the entire track, subtract :03 and you have the exact playing time of the recording. A :03 difference between label time and actual playing time is inconsequential to most of us, however if you REALLY want to discuss label errors, I recommend starting with the Philles single of "You've Lost That Lovin' Feelin', which most certainly does NOT play for 3:15!
Edited by Tom Daly |
|
![]() |
|
Edoz ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 04 March 2013 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If all of the versions of HOTRS on CD are the full length album version and the edited US single is not available on CD, then why are the appearances listed in Pat's database not flagged as "album version?"
|
|
![]() |
|
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 123 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think those were labeled in the database at one point, so I’m not sure
why Pat removed them. To clarify, though, the original vinyl LP and 45 are the same, and both have the edited version. The longer version is technically originally from the Greatest Hits LP. |
|
![]() |
|
Edoz ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 04 March 2013 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yes...that's so (as you know).
Even though the US edit is crappy, it would be nice to have it on at least one CD reissue for history's sake. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |