Top 40 Music on CD Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Top 40 Music On Compact Disc > Chat Board
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - a couple of Turtles comments
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

a couple of Turtles comments

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
davidclark View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 17 November 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 29
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote davidclark Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: a couple of Turtles comments
    Posted: 04 May 2006 at 6:15pm
thanks for your responses as usual Pat.

I listened to "Elenore" and can't find a difference bewteen the stereo and mono versions. What makes them LP vs. 45 version (other than the mix)?

Also on "You Showed Me", I believe this warrants versioning, as the stereo (from Rhino Greatest Hits, assuming this is the stero LP version) is longer and has drums before the :11 second mark. The mono (from Sunshine Days Pop Classics of the '60s Volume 1, assuming that's the 45) is shorter and does not have the drums (or it's so buried I can't hear it).
dc1
Back to Top
Pat Downey View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 01 October 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pat Downey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 May 2006 at 9:14pm
From my notes, Elenore is classified as a 45 version due to the difference in reverb between the 45 and LP.

Now for the song "You Showed Me", I don't hear drums prior to :11 on the stereo version but I do hear a hi hat prior to :11 on the stereo versions. When I fold the stereo down to a mono signal I lose the hi hat completely in the resulting mix so I will toss this one out to other chat board members as to what they think about this issue.
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 208
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 May 2006 at 10:05pm
That's very interesting, Pat. Here's what I can share about why this phenomenon happens...

Imagine you have two identical, mono wave sound files. On one of the sound files, you invert the waveform. In other words, since the wave has an axis that it continually crosses back and forth over, you can "flip it vertically" over the axis (so that anything on top of the axis is now on the bottom). What happens when you sum the two wave sound files together (one inverted and one not) is that they cancel each other out.

Of course, I'm talking in terms of how we view it on a computer screen, but the same thing happens when you reverse the negative and positive wires of an audio cable. If you have the exact same audio going throuh two channels, except that one is hooked up in reverse, and then you sum the audio together (in other words, mono it), the result is that they cancel each other.

In the case of this song, the only logical conclusion I can come up with is that the hi-hat, which was in both channels, somehow got inverted in one channel. (Perhaps the sound engineer had the positive and negative wires reversed in one channel when mastering the hi-hat.) Therefore, when you fold down the two channels, they cancel each other out.

I'm no sound engineer, so this may not be the case, but it's at least what I do know about why sounds can mysteriously disappear when stereo is folded down to mono.
Back to Top
Bill Cahill View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 27 June 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bill Cahill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 May 2006 at 9:45pm
You Showed Me was not mixed well in stereo. I think all the instruments are there on both versions, it's just that the mono mix sounds significantly better sonically. Has more punch. Probably doesn't deserve a "single version" mention. Elenore does because of the gobs of reverb added to the single.
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 208
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 October 2007 at 12:29pm
I had a chance to listen to both the original White Whale 45 copy of "Happy Together" and the version that shows up on CD in mono on Varese's Best Of compilation. While I cannot remember which one is the faster of the two, there is a significant pitch difference between the 45 and CD versions, even though it's the same mix. There is currently no notation in the database regarding this CD, but a pitch comment should probably be added.

Edited by aaronk
Back to Top
jimct View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jimct Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 October 2007 at 2:43pm
Aaron, my commercial 45 for "Happy Together" has a listed time of (2:50), but an actual time of (2:56).
Back to Top
Bill Cahill View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 27 June 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bill Cahill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 October 2007 at 6:29pm
On Happy Together I've noticed at on the mono hits lp that there is very little reverb on the song, at all, until the couple of piano notes after "invest a dime". Those piano notes are almost buried in reverb. So that's significantly different than the stereo mixes. I don't have the original 45 though to hear if that matches with the mono LP version.
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 208
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 October 2007 at 7:14pm
Is this a song that deserves a "45 version" and "LP version" designation because of reverb? Given Jim's information, it would appear that the 45 runs slower than the mono version on Varese.
Back to Top
PaulEschen View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 28 December 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote PaulEschen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 August 2016 at 3:51am
Has anybody else bought the most recent Turtles CD release, All The
Singles
(FloEdCo/Manifesto MFO 48040)? It sounds great, but the only
Turtles 45 I have to compare is "She'd Rather Be With Me", but it sounds the
same, with the shorter 2:08 time. I'd be interested to see how the other
pertinent singles match up.
Back to Top
The Hits Man View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 04 February 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The Hits Man Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 August 2016 at 8:28pm
Originally posted by jimct jimct wrote:

Aaron, my commercial 45 for "Happy
Together" has a listed time of (2:50), but an actual time
of (2:56).


On my copy of Varese Vintage's "Then:Totally Oldies 4",
the stereo "Happy Together" runs an actual time of 2:52.
On the new mono "All The Singles", it runs and actual
time of 2:54.

Just thought i'd throw that out there.

Edited by The Hits Man
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.086 seconds.