![]() |
survivor "the search is over" |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | |
edtop40 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 06 July 2008 at 1:46pm |
my commercial 45 issued as scoti bros 04871 states a run time on the label as 4:13 but actually runs 4:10 and is identical to the version on the cd below
(S) (4:10) Scotti Bros. 75408 Greatest Hits ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
edtop40
|
|
![]() |
|
NightAire ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 20 February 2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Does anybody have a preferred CD source for this song? My copy is from Time Life's "Sounds of the Eighties 1985-1986" and sounds fine straight off the CD, but after going through my internet radio station's audio processing and the data compression to stream it, the sound gurgles during the quiet parts.
I'm assuming it's just something weird with the way my copy works with my processing... but I know some of the people here like CFTP are really good about discovering "this one is a digital clone of this one, and that one is a re-eq'd version of that one, and that one runs .3% slower than this one.." I thought if somebody has a preference for another one (maybe off the original "Vital Signs?"), I could try getting a copy of it and see if my "gurgle" goes away, or if it's something in the master recording that's driving my audio chain crazy. Thanks in advance for any help anyone can offer! This is a perplexing and annoying problem. |
|
![]() |
|
crapfromthepast ![]() Music Fan ![]() ![]() Joined: 14 September 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 28 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Funny you should ask! I haven't done a direct head-to-
head comparison, but I have some older notes about this song. Your version off Time-Life's Sounds Of The Eighties Vol. 12 1985-1986 (1995) is a differently EQ'd digital clone of Priority's Eighties Greatest Rock Hits Vol. 5 From The Heart (1992), which is a little too loud and clips a bit. I don't think too highly of most of those Priority collections. Some are thought to have a Waring noise reduction process on them - don't know if that would be the source of your noise or not. I think that Madacy's Rock On 1985 Walking On Sunshine (1998) also uses the Priority disc as its source, but I'd need to confirm. A better bet would be the Scotti Brothers Greatest Hits (1993), which is quite a nice-sounding disc. I use it as the source for all my Survivor tracks. There's a digital clone (1 dB louder) on Time-Life's Guitar Rock Vol. 27 Power Ballads (1999) and a differently EQ'd digital clone on Time-Life's Body Talk Vol. 12 By Candlelight (1997). Any of these should sound good. I'd be very curious to know if the GH-based versions of the song clear up the problem for you, or if they still show the same noise. |
|
![]() |
|
NightAire ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 20 February 2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'll give the greatest hits version a try! I shied away from it, only because so often they are "remastered" with all that lovely digital clipping that's been so popular for the past decade... but since it's from 1993... maybe it'll be OK!
I'll plan on posting an update when I get the track replaced; thanks for the input! (I agree with your opinion of Priority discs: BLEAH. For the most part, at least. They've tended to sound like CDs of tape transfers of the recordings... maybe like a CD of the cassette master tape or something.) |
|
![]() |
|
995wlol ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 10 December 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would recommend the 1993 Scotti Bros Greatest Hits disc over the original Vital Signs CD. There is no over-compression or clipping on Hits. The sound on my Vital Signs CD is very thin (it is an early Japan for US pressing, so perhaps the US pressings sounded better).
|
|
![]() |
|
crapfromthepast ![]() Music Fan ![]() ![]() Joined: 14 September 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 28 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think we're all in agreement about the 1993 GH disc -
very nice-sounding, no clipping, no bad EQ, no excessive compression/limiting. And I think it could be bought pretty cheaply nowadays. I gave a listen to both the Priority and GH discs, and I noticed that the piano is mixed with an odd phasing on both. The left and right channels of the piano are partially out of phase, so that when mixed to mono the levels on the piano are a bit lower than the centered vocals. I didn't notice a substantial difference between the discs when I mixed them both to mono. Not sure if the out-of-phasiness could confuse the compressor/limiter, but it might do something odd if the L and R volumes are each larger than the L+R mono volume. Very curious to hear what the GH disc does for you... |
|
![]() |
|
NightAire ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 20 February 2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I got a copy of the disc tonight, and you guys are right: it looks GREAT in Adobe Audition.
Normally I put my audio files through both "centering" and phase correction... although I might not have been doing that when I made the original rip. However, since I had problems with it before, I have done NOTHING to this file other than maximize it to 100% volume on the peaks. You may be on to something about the phasing issues. Technically I have a phase corrector on my chain (Stereo Tool), but if the phase varries, it might be "fluttering" back and forth, creating that "gurgle." It should play in the next day or two; I'll let you know how it goes! |
|
![]() |
|
Todd Ireland ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
One of the first 30 CDs I ever bought was Survivor's Vital Signs. My copy is a U.S. pressing and I've always thought the sound quality on this disc is excellent.
|
|
![]() |
|
NightAire ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 20 February 2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
FINALLY got to hear this song from start to finish on my stream; for the most part, the annoying gurgle seems to be gone, using the version from the greatest hits CD. I'm now wondering if the "Vital Signs" version might clean it up even further; I might try both copies and see what happens.
There was still a tiny bit of gurgle in the opening just as he's singing, "...I was always reaching..." but you had to be listening pretty close. Another tiny bit of gurgle as they're wrapping up the lyrics right at the end. My suspicion now is that I've found a song that contains primary tones, harmonics and sub-harmonics at the same time that are just difficult for the mp3 codec to figure out what to keep and what to throw away. ...Maybe I should just increase my encoding rate! :) Anyway, THANK YOU for everyone's help; sorry this response was so delayed. I think we've done about all we can do for now. (Just for clarity, I want to specify that the "gurgle" comes from listening to my 96 kbps mp3 stream encoded with the latest version of LAME, after running through the multi-band compressor section of Stereo Tool (set extremely slow) and Sound Solution 1.31 set fairly aggressively [everything but the Stereo Expander, Clipper, & pre-emphesis are active]. This is followed by a look-ahead independent channel peak limiter which keeps peaks to -1.75 db into the encoder.) |
|
![]() |
|
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 123 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah, anything at 96kbps is bound to have a lot of artifacts, but I'm sure it saves on bandwidth for streaming.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |