Zoom Meeting #2
Printed From: Top 40 Music on CD
Category: Top 40 Music On Compact Disc
Forum Name: Chat Board
Forum Description: Chat away but please observe the chat board rules
URL: https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9545
Printed Date: 02 May 2025 at 4:59pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.07 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Zoom Meeting #2
Posted By: Paul Haney
Subject: Zoom Meeting #2
Date Posted: 27 January 2021 at 5:22am
Since there was such a good response to our first online meeting, I thought we might try it again.
I'm looking at Sunday - February 21st - preferably in the afternoon (say 3PM Central time).
The first one was fun, but kind of all over the place. I'd like to make this one a little more formatted.
Maybe going around the horn and having each person talk a little bit about themselves and sharing with the
group how they got started collecting and what and how they collect their music.
If you are interested in joining, drop me a PM (with your current e-mail address) and we'll go from there.
Hope to see you in February!
|
Replies:
Posted By: crapfromthepast
Date Posted: 27 January 2021 at 9:10am
Paul - I'm in!
I know there were a few people on the last call who were too shy to ask their questions, so I'd suggest soliciting questions from people in advance. The questions can be directed at specific people, or to the group as a whole.
Looking forward to it!
Thanks,
Ron G
(Oops - this was supposed to be a PM, but it works as a public post.)
------------- There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one http://www.crapfromthepast.com" rel="nofollow - Crap From The Past .
|
Posted By: Paul Haney
Date Posted: 27 January 2021 at 9:48am
Good idea, Ron!
Again, I'd like to give everyone a chance to talk a little bit about themselves and their music collection.
However, if anyone can think of any general questions for the group (especially if you can't make the meeting),
then please feel free to post them in this thread!
|
Posted By: Paul Haney
Date Posted: 27 January 2021 at 9:48am
Also, I'd like to limit the meeting to around 15 or so participants. So please let me know as soon as you can!
|
Posted By: Chartman
Date Posted: 27 January 2021 at 11:49am
Paul Haney wrote:
Also, I'd like to limit the meeting
to around 15 or so participants. So please let me know
as soon as you can! |
Any chance Joel could be one of those 15? I know it's a
no go but doesn't hurt to ask!
|
Posted By: Paul Haney
Date Posted: 29 January 2021 at 2:14am
Thanks to everyone who has responded so far!
There's still a few spots open, so please drop me a PM if you think you'd be interested.
|
Posted By: Jody Thornton
Date Posted: 29 January 2021 at 5:45am
I sent you a PM Paul. Hopefully I can make it in.
------------- Cheers,
Jody Thornton
(Richmond Hill, Ontario)
|
Posted By: Paul Haney
Date Posted: 29 January 2021 at 6:56am
Jody Thornton wrote:
I sent you a PM Paul. Hopefully I can make it in.
|
Thanks, Jody. You're in!
|
Posted By: davidclark
Date Posted: 30 January 2021 at 9:27pm
I would love to join, but I would have to be awake (and coherent) at 4am my
time. sigh...
------------- dc1
|
Posted By: Paul Haney
Date Posted: 31 January 2021 at 12:40pm
It looks like we've now got a full house for the next Zoom meeting. As of today (Sunday - January 31st), everybody
who asked to participate should be in. Hopefully I got back to most of you (if I didn't, I apologize). It's still 3
weeks away yet, so let me know if you can't make it in case somebody else wants to join.
Thanks and hope to see you all then!
|
Posted By: EdisonLite
Date Posted: 31 January 2021 at 12:47pm
Looks like I got in, in the nick of time! I really enjoyed the last one and hope we continue to do them.
|
Posted By: Paul Haney
Date Posted: 03 February 2021 at 4:21am
Just a quick update...
The meeting is now full. Thanks to everyone who responded.
I may even have a surprise guest or two.
I'll be posting reminders as we get closer to February 21st.
Should be fun!
|
Posted By: Ringmaster_D
Date Posted: 03 February 2021 at 6:29am
Hi Paul,
Not sure how I missed this thread. Let me know if a slot
opens up for me. I enjoyed it so much the first time
around I hate to miss it.
Dave
|
Posted By: Hykker
Date Posted: 04 February 2021 at 7:25am
I'm looking forward to it myself, really enjoyed the
last one.
|
Posted By: AutumnAarilyn
Date Posted: 05 February 2021 at 8:15pm
I have a question for those who worked in radio at any
point time.
What was the determining factors of playing a new
song other than the issuance of a single?
It seemed Top 40 would wait as long as they could
before they began playing a new record. I know they
believed that any R&B or country crossover should be
fueled by a Top 10 on that chart first.
I'm from NY and our R&B stations were extremely
competitive and aggressive in what they played. They
were called by labels several times and told not to
play that song (atleast not yet anyway). WBLS and WRKS
would play album cuts (future singles) and in one case
gave the Commodores an unforeseen crossover mega-
seller in "Three times a lady" which was regarded by
Motown as filler. How aggressive were your PD's with
the "spice tracks" that other stations weren't playing
and were they ever told by labels to "Knock it off"?
|
Posted By: EdisonLite
Date Posted: 05 February 2021 at 8:20pm
Where did you read or hear that Motown regarded "Three Times a Lady" as filler? I guess nothing should surprise me, but that does. That really was the 1st piano-based, fully AC ballad hit for Lionel, and that style became a staple of what he wrote. Maybe the label thought of it as a 3rd or 4th single (which would be shortsighted) but just an album cut?
Sorry to get off your topic. I'm curious to what other people have to say to your main point.
|
Posted By: AutumnAarilyn
Date Posted: 05 February 2021 at 10:31pm
Someone from Motown (perhaps Gordy himself called Hal
Jackson) who was program director of WBLS in 1978 in
NYC and told him to stop playing "Three times a lady"
as it wasn't a song they thought had any potential. By
1986, Hal hosted his own show, Sunday classics in
which he would discuss many of his many encounters
from the 30's to then present day. He made 96 and did
the show up until a week before his death in 2011.
Listening to Hal was like opening an encyclopedia.
Lionel made a solid career out of that sound but
before that they drove as hard as the Ohio Players on
the funk side.
You never know how things are going to shake out.
You'd think Mr. Gordy might have learned that the
first time when he almost didn't release Marvin's
"What's going on"Lp. Did you hear about that one,
Edison?
|
Posted By: EdisonLite
Date Posted: 06 February 2021 at 1:35am
The "What's Going On" story rings a vague bell. Did Gordy think it was too political a message and want Marvin to stick to more love-oriented topics or something?
Those Hal Jackson stories/shows sound like they were really good.
|
Posted By: Paul Haney
Date Posted: 06 February 2021 at 5:48am
Adding records back then varied from market-to-market (and sometimes even station-to-station). In my
home market of Minneapolis/St. Paul (during the 1970s), the major Top 40 stations would only add
certain R&B crossovers if they were huge sellers. In 1981, WLOL went Top 40 and they started opening
up the market to more of those R&B hits. They were also more aggressive than KDWB on adding new
artists and as a result, their ratings were very solid for most of the decade. Ironically, by the late
1980s and early 1990s, KDWB suddenly got hot and ended up the big Top 40 winner, a position they still
hold today.
As for album cuts, KDWB played quite a few of them during the 1970s. Mostly the big rock artists,
catering to the upper mid-west listeners musical tastes at the time.
|
Posted By: AndrewChouffi
Date Posted: 06 February 2021 at 7:32am
Although I'm not questioning the accuracy of the
story, I find it somewhat hard to believe that Berry
Gordy would have a problem with a station playing
"Three Times A Lady" a little early.
Why?
'Natural High' the album was released in May without
an advance (or contemporaneous) single. Generally
when a label does that to a hit act it means they want
the radio stations and public to find "the hit". Well,
the stations found it...
This wasn't too common of a practice, although hit
bands like Three Dog Night oftentimes did it that way.
I do recall, though, many instances of a label having
a release strategy with singles and not wanting radio
to jump on an album track that might already be slated
as the third single when the second single hasn't been
released yet - basically they wanted maximum impact
with the forthcoming video they hadn't started on
yet..
Does anyone else have anything to add to this or
similar stories to tell?
Andy
|
Posted By: eriejwg
Date Posted: 06 February 2021 at 12:10pm
I was working at a small AM station in 1978 when Three
Times A Lady came out. The PD at the station had an odd way
of putting new music in. Basically, if it was on the Hot
100 and we had received the record from Record Source
International in Cincinnati, then we played it.
I seem to remember Three Times A Lady getting a lot of
requests and RSI didn't always service us with all the hits
so I may have had to go to the local Murphy's or Fisher's
Big Wheel in that town to buy the 45 for the station. I
know I had to do that for Two Out Of Three Ain't Bad from
Meat Loaf. Ahh, small town radio, lol.
------------- John Gallagher Erie, PA https://www.johngallagher.com" rel="nofollow - John Gallagher Wedding & Special Event Entertainment / Snapblast Photo Booth
|
Posted By: AutumnAarilyn
Date Posted: 06 February 2021 at 10:55pm
"Three times a lady" has very soft vocals almost like
whispering Bill Anderson on the country side of things.
Motown probably wasn't really thinking A/C crossover at
this time from their leading funksters. "I like what you
do" and "Visions" were the most original cuts.
Gordy wasn't also thrilled with some of the themes in
Marvin's "What's going on" despite Edwin Starr has a
huge hit with with "War."
It always helps to make sure the PD gets a promo. They
even had issues in NYC getting promos.
|
Posted By: AutumnAarilyn
Date Posted: 06 February 2021 at 11:03pm
AndrewChouffi wrote:
I do recall, though, many instances of a label having
a release strategy with singles and not wanting radio
to jump on an album track that might already be slated
as the third single when the second single hasn't been
released yet - basically they wanted maximum impact
with the forthcoming video they hadn't started on
yet..
Andy
|
When Bobby Brown's Bobby dropped, the label had a huge
release party broadcast over several radio stations
where they played much of the album during that party.
Wrks followed suit by playing singles early and it
wasn't taken so well over at MCA.
I heard every track on NY radio from both Guy albums,
Babyface's "Tender lover", and Johnny Gills 1990
Motown album.
|
Posted By: torcan
Date Posted: 07 February 2021 at 9:28pm
Interesting reading these comments. I would have
thought that when an album was released, it was fair
game for any track to be played on the radio. I guess
the labels didn't want top 40 stations to play songs
that weren't singles, because it could take time away
from playing the songs that they were promoting as
singles?
When an album was released, in most cases were all the
singles planned out in advance (for example, they knew
which would be the second single, which would be the
third, etc.) or was it decided on on the fly?
Sometimes its obvious which songs should be singles
but was the order of release always set in stone, or
did it vary based on whims of the label, or strong
responses on certain songs? In reading Billboard over
the years, it seems that some songs they said would be
later singles never did get released.
I know that when "Thriller" was in the midst of its
run, the plan was originally to make "Human Nature"
the last single, but because sales of the album were
still so strong, they kept releasing them.
Was there a scenario which occurred more frequently?
|
Posted By: EdisonLite
Date Posted: 07 February 2021 at 9:37pm
There were so many sealed LPs that had stickers on the outside saying "featuring the singles..." or "featuring the songs..." - I think in both cases anything on the sticker would have been considered a future single. But in many cases, those songs that the label highlighted for the outside sticker ... did not end up being singles at all.
|
Posted By: AutumnAarilyn
Date Posted: 07 February 2021 at 10:57pm
Like all art, what the next single would be was never
set in stone and alot depended on how the early
singles did. If they didn't do well, the label would
usually cut their losses with a hole punch and trip to
the cut-out bin if the cost of warehousing a title
exceeded any benefit of future expected sales.
Atlantic Starr had a number of album air cuts before
was monitored at Billboard and they did it to sell the
album. A&M didn't release those probably to sell the
album but if you listen to "Secret lovers", their
ballads weren't easy to edit with vocals having to be
cross-faded.
I remember reading that promoters wanted country to
drop a song after it peaked. In 1991, Billboard used
accurate monitoring of sales and airplay and the
logjam on the pop chart began. In the end, Billboard
slowly ushered in new expanded rules for their
recurrent chart to increase the desired upward
movement.
|
Posted By: AndrewChouffi
Date Posted: 08 February 2021 at 6:33am
AutumnAarilyn wrote:
Like all art, what the next
single would be was never set in stone and alot
depended on how the early singles did. |
Extremely accurate statement there AutumnAarilyn.
However, sometimes with a hot act with a hot album,
labels would plan a release strategy with singles,
videos and other "emphasis cuts for select formats" in
advance of the second single or even the release of
the LP.
Labels didn't like deviation; however when the public
or radio demanded a change (e.g. an album track was
getting unusual attention) OR when the project
strategy was failing (i.e. a single was stiffing) the
labels were quick to abandon original plans (to either
make more money, or to cut losses).
Andy
|
Posted By: AutumnAarilyn
Date Posted: 09 February 2021 at 8:19pm
By the 80's, albums had songs slated for different
formats. Black radio typically was a wake-up club in
the morning, hot urban AC in the day time, a R&B top
40 in evening, and free form Quiet Storm ballads at
night with all sorts of jazz mixed in. Any rap was
limited to the evening section and this held until
about the mid 90's.
Many ballads weren't released as singles as those
listeners had more money to buy albums and the
listener usually didn't want a truncated ballad.
Atlantic Starr was one of those groups. If you listen
to the Spinners first album on Atlantic, the shortest
songs were the hit singles and many ballads go on for
6 plus minutes and got heavy airplay especially at
night.
|
|