Print Page | Close Window

"Put a Little Love in Your Heart"

Printed From: Top 40 Music on CD
Category: Top 40 Music On Compact Disc
Forum Name: Chat Board
Forum Description: Chat away but please observe the chat board rules
URL: https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=811
Printed Date: 03 May 2025 at 10:26pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.07 - https://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: "Put a Little Love in Your Heart"
Posted By: Todd Ireland
Subject: "Put a Little Love in Your Heart"
Date Posted: 06 April 2006 at 7:32pm
Here's another Jackie DeShannon question similar to my previous one... According to the database, CD appearances for "Put a Little Love in Your Heart" range in length from 2:29 to 2:37. Does anyone know the actual run time of the 45 and the original LP length?



Replies:
Posted By: Pat Downey
Date Posted: 06 April 2006 at 8:31pm
Both the 45 and LP state a running time of (2:40) and they both run (2:38).


Posted By: Todd Ireland
Date Posted: 06 April 2006 at 9:10pm
Interesting... So it appears all CD appearances of the song to date run shorter than the 45 and LP length, some by as much as :10. Thanks, I appreciate the info., Pat.


Posted By: crapfromthepast
Date Posted: 24 September 2020 at 8:46pm
Mono 45 version (printed 2:40, actual 2:38)

The commercial 45 is mono. (According to a Todd Ireland post from 2012.)

The mono version doesn't appear on CD. (EDIT: It does appear on a UK CD release.)

I believe that the 45 may be a fold-down of the stereo LP version, but can't confirm. (EDIT: It's a dedicated mix.)

Stereo LP version (printed 2:40, actual ?)

The oldest CD I have with the stereo version is Time-Life's Classic Rock Vol. 6 1969 (1988), where it's taken from vinyl. You can hear an occasional crackle on the fade. As vinyl dubs go, it's not too bad; there's clearly no extra noise reduction being used. The same analog transfer is used on:
  • Time-Life's 2-CD Singers And Songwriters Vol. 16 1969-1972 (2001)
There's a different analog transfer on PolyTel Canada's 2-CD Ready To Rock (1988). If it's from vinyl, it's cleaner than Classic Rock, but it fades about ten seconds earlier than Classic Rock and abruptly fades to silence with no tail at all on the fade. Suspicious; probably to hide turntable rumble?

Finally, there's a better-sounding analog transfer on Cema Special Markets' Rock-N-Roll's Greatest Hits Of All Time Late 60s Vol. 3 (1995), which seems to be from a tape source. I don't hear any cracklies, or any loss in the high end on the fade (a telltale sign of noise reduction). This series uses mastering from earlier discs on virtually all of its tracks, but I don't know where this one originated. (EMI's Very Best Of? EMI's Definitive Collection? Capitol's Classic Masters?)

Non-hit stereo remix (actual 2:31)

It turns up on Rhino's Jackie DeShannon Best Of (1991), but I can't confirm that it originated on this disc.

It's tasteful, and sounds terrific, but it's not quite the same mix as the stereo LP mix on the CDs listed above. On the original mix, there's plenty of reverb on the vocals; listen for the word "hesitate" at 0:18. On the remix, the vocals are relatively dry. On the original mix, the first snare hit is a teeny bit muffled, compared to the next snare hit and later snare hits. Not so on the remix.

The same analog transfer as Best Of is used on:
  • Time-Life's Superhits Vol. 7 1969 (1991) - fades early by about five beats
  • Time-Life's AM Gold Vol. 1 1969 (1991) - this whole CD is a digitally-identical repackaging of Superhits Vol. 7 1969, so it too fades early by about five beats
  • Sessions/Warner Special Products' 2-CD Rock Revival (1991) - fades early by about five beats
  • Starland/Warner Special Products' 2-CD Golden Dreams (1993) - fades early by about five beats
  • Simitar's Love Rocks 2 Tonight's The Night (1998) - doesn't fade early
  • Madacy's Rock On 1969 (2004) - fades early by about five beats
My recommendations

For the original stereo mix, the best I can do is recommend Cema Special Markets' Rock-N-Roll's Greatest Hits Of All Time Late 60s Vol. 3 (1995), until I can determine where this mastering originated. It sounds fine here, but this is a relatively uncommon disc.

For the non-hit stereo remix, I enthusiastically recommend Rhino's Jackie DeShannon Best Of (1991), which sounds superb. She wrote some great songs, and this Best Of includes her non-hit original 1975 version of Kim Carnes' 1981 hit "Bette Davis Eyes".

-------------
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one http://www.crapfromthepast.com" rel="nofollow - Crap From The Past .


Posted By: Brian W.
Date Posted: 25 September 2020 at 2:09am
Originally posted by crapfromthepast crapfromthepast wrote:

Mono 45 version (printed 2:40, actual 2:38)

The commercial 45 is mono. (According to a Todd Ireland post from 2012.)

The mono version doesn't appear on CD.



This isn't it? This CD came out in 2012. It was mono here. Is this not the correct version?

https://www.discogs.com/Jackie-DeShannon-Keep-Me-In-Mind/release/4658574 - https://www.discogs.com/Jackie-DeShannon-Keep-Me-In-Mind/rel ease/4658574

Album also now available as a flac download, by track, from Capitol, with a slightly different title:

https://www.qobuz.com/us-en/album/the-complete-singles-vol-3-1967-1970-jackie-deshannon/cjz8ktp77iemb - https://www.qobuz.com/us-en/album/the-complete-singles-vol-3 -1967-1970-jackie-deshannon/cjz8ktp77iemb



Posted By: Paul C
Date Posted: 25 September 2020 at 5:22am
Originally posted by Brian W. Brian W. wrote:

Originally posted by crapfromthepast crapfromthepast wrote:

Mono 45
version (printed 2:40, actual 2:38)

The commercial 45 is mono. (According to a Todd
Ireland post from 2012.)

The mono version doesn't appear on CD.



This isn't it? This CD came out in 2012. It was mono
here. Is this not the correct version?

https://www.discogs.com/Jackie-DeShannon-Keep-Me-
In-Mind/release/4658574
-
https://www.discogs.com/Jackie-DeShannon-Keep-Me-In-
Mind/rel ease/4658574





One of the three volumes of Jackie DeShannon Imperial
and Liberty singles issued by Ace UK in their single
mixes (unlike some of Ace's other supposed 'singles'
collections, eg. Ray Stevens, Garnet Mimms). Jackie
had only three Top 40 hits in the US;
she had seven in Canada.


Posted By: crapfromthepast
Date Posted: 25 September 2020 at 6:49am
Nice to know that it's out there - that looks like a nice package. It isn't listed in the database because it's a UK release.

-------------
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one http://www.crapfromthepast.com" rel="nofollow - Crap From The Past .


Posted By: PopArchivist
Date Posted: 25 September 2020 at 9:42pm
WOW! Thanks Brian W. Would have never known...

-------------
Favorite two expressions to live by on this board: "You can't download vinyl" and "Not everything is available on CD."


Posted By: MMathews
Date Posted: 26 September 2020 at 1:10pm
Ron,
I did a sync-check on this a few years back. The mono is
a dedicated mix, not a fold-down.
The instruments vary in volume levels and the reverb is
slightly different in the mono
single.

I had downloaded the mono from the above mentioned
digital singles compilation.

MM


Posted By: LunarLaugh
Date Posted: 26 September 2020 at 4:41pm
Those 3 ACE sets are great. They also produced a couple
of discs worth of compilations of other artists'
renditions of Jackie's own compositions which are truly
worth seeking out.

-------------
https://thelunarlaugh.bandcamp.com/ - Listen to The Lunar Laugh!


Posted By: Edoz
Date Posted: 28 September 2020 at 12:51pm
OK, I'm a bit cofused. Is the mono single version on one of the ACE CD's?


Posted By: aaronk
Date Posted: 28 September 2020 at 3:00pm
Yes, there are three Jackie DeShannon discs on ACE that contain her singles.

-------------
Aaron Kannowski
http://www.uptownsound.com" rel="nofollow - Uptown Sound
http://www.919thepeak.com" rel="nofollow - 91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop


Posted By: davidclark
Date Posted: 18 January 2022 at 10:39pm
getting back to the stereo....Collectables "The Very Best Of Jackie
DeShannon" CD has the fades earlier remix, so perhaps the original 1975 LP
did? Discogs has the LP with timing 2:35 whereas the original LP states 2:40.
Sounds pretty convincing to me, but the LP would be needed for our ears to
verify.

-------------
dc1



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net