Diana Ross - Upside Down
Printed From: Top 40 Music on CD
Category: Top 40 Music On Compact Disc
Forum Name: Chat Board
Forum Description: Chat away but please observe the chat board rules
URL: https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8003
Printed Date: 03 May 2025 at 10:09am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.07 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Diana Ross - Upside Down
Posted By: crapfromthepast
Subject: Diana Ross - Upside Down
Date Posted: 16 March 2014 at 8:37pm
|
The 45 length is 3:38, the LP length is 4:04.
I noticed that both the 45 and LP versions have a glitch at 0:29, right after the syllable "up". It sounds a little like a record scratch, even though that's not really what it is. I confirmed from a needledrop that it's actually on the 45, and would assume from its presence on some LP-length CD versions that it's also on the vinyl LP. 45 length The oldest CDs I have of the 45 length are three Rhino discs that all came out in 1992, all of which are digitally identical clones of one another:
There are a few CDs that use the same analog transfer as the above three:
The version on Motown's Year By Year 1980 tames the high end even more, and sounds like it's from a higher generation source tape than the above discs. I think I prefer the Billboard/Disco Years mastering over the others. The Time-Life Dance Party disc is mastered by Dennis Drake, and he retains a lot of the sizzle in the EQ, so that Dance Party has more high end than Hitsville. All of the above are the 45 length, and all have the glitch at 0:29. LP length For the LP length, it's a weird bunch of discs, none of which would rate as excellent for sound quality. Motown's All The Great Hits sounds like it uses a high-generation source tape, as does Warner Special Products' 2-CD Good Times (1991). EMI UK's 2-CD Now The Millennium Series 1980 (1999) has decent dynamic range, but shortens its fade by a few seconds compared to the others. I actually prefer slightly compressed version on Priority's Mega-Hits Dance Classics Vol. 12 (1993). The 2-CD Deluxe Edition of Diana is the only version that somehow removes the glitch at 0:29, but it's compressed and has a very aggressive mastering. It also includes the unreleased original Chic mix, which is superb and a great novelty to hear after all these years. neither One disc to avoid at all costs is Motown's 3-CD Motown Anniversary, which probably came out in 1983. The version here runs too slow, runs way short at 3:26, and sounds like it's from a very high-generation source tape. Awful. ------------- There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one http://www.crapfromthepast.com" rel="nofollow - Crap From The Past . |
Replies:
Posted By: MMathews
Date Posted: 17 March 2014 at 1:14pm
|
Ron,
You note 45 length and LP length .. was there not an edit? I thought the guitar ending had an edit in it on the 45... MM |
Posted By: Smokin' TomGary
Date Posted: 17 March 2014 at 4:36pm
| My white label Motown promo 45 M1494F (65967) has a listed and actual time of 3:37. It has the guitar ending. Deadwax is M1494F-B-6597-08B M-1494-A It appears that some minor effort to obscure the "B" was made. Side 1 is both sides. |
Posted By: crapfromthepast
Date Posted: 17 March 2014 at 4:54pm
|
Nice catch, Mark. I was using the notation from my 1955-2003 book, and never compared the 45 to the LP.
There is indeed an edit. To create the 45 from the LP, remove the 48 beats from 3:21 to 3:48 of the LP version. The edit points fall two beats before the little crash cymbal. The 45 fade points are the same as the LP, so that one edit is the only difference. ------------- There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one http://www.crapfromthepast.com" rel="nofollow - Crap From The Past . |
Posted By: sriv94
Date Posted: 17 March 2014 at 9:11pm
OK, I must be nuts. Listening to my version on iTunes from the Billboard 1980 disc, I don't hear a glitch. (And my copy on iTunes is an M4A file, so I pulled it in directly form the disc.) ------------- Doug --------------- All of the good signatures have been taken. |
crapfromthepast wrote:Posted By: NightAire
Date Posted: 18 July 2023 at 1:05pm
|
Do we know the origin of the 5 minute version that sounds to my ears like an extended version of the LP mix?
It's on https://www.discogs.com/release/1997225-Various-Dance-Classics-Volume-23-24 - Dance Classics Volume 23 & 24 , a 2009 compilation from the Netherlands. I'm not aware of it showing up anywhere else, and I can't find evidence it was released at the time (based again on Discogs). If this was available in 1980, I'd want to play it on my station. The CD labels it as the "12" version" but I couldn't find a 12" single that had anything labeled that long. (Some had the LP length; others had the single edit.) I'd also love to know where the company in the Netherlands got this version! ------------- Gene Savage http://www.BlackLightRadio.com - http://www.BlackLightRadio.com http://www.facebook.com/TulsaSavage - http://www.facebook.com/TulsaSavage Tulsa, Oklahoma USA |
Posted By: crapfromthepast
Date Posted: 18 July 2023 at 2:49pm
|
Gene - I'm 99% sure that it's a homemade edit. It can be reconstructed using pieces from the LP version. If there was a real 12" version, I would have run across it by now (I've been a huge fan of this track since 1980).
Those "Dance Classics" CDs are great for what they are, but they're not striving for authenticity. I get the sense that they just wanted to put out cool versions of the songs that they DJed with, and the labeling (and possibly the licensing) were afterthoughts. ------------- There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one http://www.crapfromthepast.com" rel="nofollow - Crap From The Past . |
Posted By: NightAire
Date Posted: 19 July 2023 at 1:42pm
|
Great info... so it's more looping than actual new audio from the original master tapes.
Thanks for the clarification!! ------------- Gene Savage http://www.BlackLightRadio.com - http://www.BlackLightRadio.com http://www.facebook.com/TulsaSavage - http://www.facebook.com/TulsaSavage Tulsa, Oklahoma USA |
Posted By: NightAire
Date Posted: 22 July 2023 at 10:15pm
|
UPDATE: Well, while I haven't been able to get a 1987 / 1990 pressing of the "Diana" CD, I've gotten several others, and the results are interesting.
The 1999 "remastering" didn't exactly brickwall it, but it's pretty dense. Frequency response now goes all the way up to 22.05 kHz, but it has an average RMS power of -12 to -13 db. File times out to 4:04.578. The 48 kHz / 24 bit (MQA) and 192 kHz . 24 bit remasters sound similar to each other, but amazingly less compressed than the 1999 CD. Stereo imagery, to my ears, seems more "stable" or "solid" than other versions. I don't know if this the greater bit depth / frequency response, or just being less compressed. These run about -16.5 Average RMS Power, and while they appear to have some peak control applied, I really think they sound the best of the ones I've heard so far. They run 4:05.562 I got one more copy of "Upside Down" from "Diana Ross - All The Best." It's a 96 kHz / 24 bit remaster... except the frequency response cuts off sharply at 21.78 kHz! I'd feel robbed if I paid extra for this. (Whether or not you could hear it is a discussion for another time.) It runs an Average RMS Power of about -15, and looks dynamically controlled but not limited or clipped. Sound is a little flat. Some may prefer this mastering but I think it sounds like it could have had noise reduction applied although the frequency display doesn't show it. I'm not sure if this was an early digital master or exactly what's going on. Seems a little gritty. Just not to my taste. It runs 4:05.421. I';m still looking for a copy of the 1987 / 1990 original release. If I find it, I'll update this post. -- Ron, you are SO right about the LP version. If it sounds decent, the wavefile shows it's been manipulated; if it's a good dynamic range, it sounds like either noise reduction has been applied (or maybe Dolby is switched on when it shouldn't be). A little research on Discogs suggests it was first released on CD in 1987. It was then re-released in 1999 with the following notes: "Digitally remastered using 24-bit technology." The 2003 two-disc version is the one that I understand is limited to death, stomping out all of the dynamics. ------------- Gene Savage http://www.BlackLightRadio.com - http://www.BlackLightRadio.com http://www.facebook.com/TulsaSavage - http://www.facebook.com/TulsaSavage Tulsa, Oklahoma USA |
Posted By: EternalStatic
Date Posted: 25 July 2023 at 9:55am
|
Thanks for this info. on the different masterings. I have the "Deluxe Edition" downloaded, and while it sounds good for loud, casual listening, it's certainly no
audiophile's dream as you noted. I may check out the hi-res remaster you (Gene) listed above. |
Posted By: crapfromthepast
Date Posted: 25 July 2023 at 11:33am
|
I have more sources for the LP version than I did nine years ago.
The oldest is likely Motown's Compact Command Performance 14 Greatest Hits (1984). It sounds pretty good here, with an excellent dynamic range, reasonable EQ, seemingly low-generation source tapes, and no evidence of added noise reduction on the fade. The same analog transfer is used on:
Motown's All The Great Hits (copyright 1981) and Warner Special Products' 2-CD Good Times (1991) sound like they used the same high-generation source tape. Avoid for this track. I haven't heard the 1999 reissue, or the hi-rez/MQA mastering. Of the batch I listed above, Motown's Compact Command Performance 14 Greatest Hits (1984) is a clear winner for the LP version. ------------- There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one http://www.crapfromthepast.com" rel="nofollow - Crap From The Past . |