Michael Jackson-"Smooth Criminal"
Printed From: Top 40 Music on CD
Category: Top 40 Music On Compact Disc
Forum Name: Chat Board
Forum Description: Chat away but please observe the chat board rules
URL: https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2692
Printed Date: 19 May 2025 at 3:47am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.07 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Michael Jackson-"Smooth Criminal"
Posted By: jimct
Subject: Michael Jackson-"Smooth Criminal"
Date Posted: 12 November 2007 at 12:55am
|
My promo CD single (ESK 1274) has the following, and, in what may be a first, all 6 versions have the EXACT same listed and actual times!
1-Single Mix (4:10) 2-Dance Mix - Extended (7:45) 3-Dance Mix - Radio Edit (5:21) 4-"Annie" Mix (5:35) 5-Dance Mix - Dub Version (4:45) 6-A Cappella Mix (4:12) |
Replies:
Posted By: waldo
Date Posted: 12 November 2007 at 3:47am
|
i have the five track US promo, it leaves off the single version. there is also an Instrumental version floating around a scarse 3" Japanese cd.
|
Posted By: Todd Ireland
Date Posted: 08 October 2008 at 7:26pm
| Regarding Michael Jackson's "Smooth Criminal", Pat has entered Jim's promo CD single info into the database. I also wanted to add that commercial 45 copies run 4:09. (Timing info compliments of abagon. The printed record label time is 4:10.) |
Posted By: 995wlol
Date Posted: 15 August 2021 at 3:23pm
|
What are the easily identified differences between the LP version and single mix?
I own an early CD pressing of "Bad" that runs 4:19 and is presumably the LP version, as well as the promo 7" that runs 4:10, but other than the single sounding sped-up, I can't really tell a difference. |
Posted By: aaronk
Date Posted: 15 August 2021 at 5:17pm
|
The most obvious difference is a tom tom fill before the first verse
starts. ------------- Aaron Kannowski http://www.uptownsound.com" rel="nofollow - Uptown Sound http://www.919thepeak.com" rel="nofollow - 91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop |
Posted By: 995wlol
Date Posted: 15 August 2021 at 7:19pm
Ah, I hear it now--thanks, Aaron! |
aaronk wrote: