Cerrone-"Love In ’C’ Minor - Pt. I"
Printed From: Top 40 Music on CD
Category: Top 40 Music On Compact Disc
Forum Name: Chat Board
Forum Description: Chat away but please observe the chat board rules
URL: https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1843
Printed Date: 16 July 2025 at 4:12pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.07 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Cerrone-"Love In ’C’ Minor - Pt. I"
Posted By: jimct
Subject: Cerrone-"Love In ’C’ Minor - Pt. I"
Date Posted: 08 March 2007 at 2:42am
|
Certain to be a Cashbox stiff, and as a result not currently found in the database, is this 1977 #36 Billboard-peaking chart entry. However, for any interested chart completists, my commercial 45 has a listed time of (3:58), but an actual time of (3:48). By chance, to obtain a different song on the disc, I recently bought the Varese V/A CD "Disco Classics", which also claimed to contain "Love In 'C' Minor (Part One)" on it. I was pleasantly surprised by this. There is no listed time for this track anywhere on the CD, but it has an actual time of (4:01). I was initially hoping it was the correct 45v, but it now seems certain, with a :13 second time difference, to be a "neither" version. I'm 99% sure I heard at least 3 less-than-perfect edits done, all during the last minute of my 45. For any curious researchers out there, I'd be happy to shoot out a vinyl dub of my 45, as a point of reference - I know I currently have at least one (6:00+) CD long version of it, as well.
|
Replies:
Posted By: edtop40
Date Posted: 13 June 2011 at 4:36pm
my commercial 45 issued as cotillion 44215 lists the run time on the label as 3:58 but actually runs 3:48, just like jim's.....if you fade out the version on the below cd
Disco Classics Varese Sarabande 302066465
for 0:10 from 3:38-3:48 you will effectively re-create the true vinyl 45.....
-------------
edtop40
|
Posted By: Santi Paradoa
Date Posted: 13 June 2011 at 5:45pm
Ed:
That disc is the same one Jim referenced above as including a "neither" version with three less than perfect edits. I'm not sure which of the two notes now is accurate.
-------------
Santi Paradoa
Miami, Florida
|
Posted By: edtop40
Date Posted: 13 June 2011 at 6:54pm
it sounds spot on to me.....where are the differences that you noticed?
-------------
edtop40
|
Posted By: aaronk
Date Posted: 13 June 2011 at 8:56pm
Actually, if you re-read Jim's post, the edits he is referring to are on his 45. It doesn't look like he compared the CD's edits with the 45, but simply noted that the disc's actual time does not match the 45's actual time.
-------------
Aaron Kannowski
http://www.uptownsound.com" rel="nofollow - Uptown Sound
http://www.919thepeak.com" rel="nofollow - 91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop
|
Posted By: Santi Paradoa
Date Posted: 14 June 2011 at 12:07pm
I guess the more accurate note would then be 45 version but 13 seconds longer, instead of "neither."
Also, does this mean the track on that CD matches every less-than-perfect edit on the vinyl 45?
-------------
Santi Paradoa
Miami, Florida
|
Posted By: edtop40
Date Posted: 14 June 2011 at 12:14pm
santi paradoa, can i send you mp3's of my vinyl 45 as well as the cd version in question for your review and analysis?
-------------
edtop40
|
|