![]() |
eels "novocaine for the soul" |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
edtop40
Music Fan
Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: eels "novocaine for the soul"Posted: 17 January 2010 at 7:34pm |
|
although not in the db because of it's airplay only status i have a promo cd single for the song "novocaine for the soul" by eels issued as dreamworks pro-cd-4906 and it contains 2 tracks as listed below
1-radio edit (3:08) 2-radio version (3:08) i don't have the full length cd/lp album version to compare them to.....unusual to have a radio edit & version as different tracks.....can anyone shed some light on this track?? |
|
|
edtop40
|
|
![]() |
|
aaronk
Admin Group
Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Online Points: 260 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2010 at 6:20am |
|
Are they both clean? There is an f-bomb in the original uncensored version.
|
|
![]() |
|
crapfromthepast
Music Fan
Joined: 14 September 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 April 2012 at 4:43pm |
|
FYI - I unearthed the uncredited sample used at the
beginning of "Novocaine For The Soul". It's from a Beatles knock-off record from 1964. (!) Details, including scans and sound clips, are in my post from the Steve Hoffman forum. Edited by crapfromthepast |
|
![]() |
|
Rich
Music Fan
Joined: 11 October 2025 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 October 2025 at 3:52pm |
I used to own that particular CD, briefly. I had been looking for the clean version that I had often heard on the radio and this would surely be the ultimate CD to go with. Fast-forward to the particular radio-unfriendly word in the middle of the song, and Track 1 (Radio Edit) was censored, but it did not sound like the same cut I usually heard on the radio. Track 2 (Radio Version) was not censored at all! Sadly I gave the CD away but I believe the printed runtimes were about right. I can't recall any other differences, they both sounded exactly like the album mix, save for that small, aforementioned edit to Track 1.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |