![]() |
The Comparison Book 1954-82 |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 789 |
Author | |
Chartman ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 26 February 2016 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Let me add an example to show you why I'm confused:
For Machine Gun Kelly's "Tickets To My Downfall" The Billboard chart shows the label as Bad Boy, EST19XX Amazon lists the label as Interscope iTunes lists the label as Bad Boy/Interscope Barnes and Nobles lists the label and number as Interscope 003243803 allmusic lists the label and number as Bad Boy/Interscope/Polydor 0736906 Discogs lists the labels and number as B0032788-02 on either Bad Boy, Interscope or EST19XX The back cover of the actual CD lists the label as Bad Boy/Interscope The label number on the CD is B003278802 You show the label and number as EST19XX 032438. Generally I would go with "In Whitburn We Trust" however there seem to be other options worth considering. Bad Boy/Interscope 032788 would be my choice (going with the CD) but I'm not the expert here. Edited by Chartman |
|
![]() |
|
Paul Haney ![]() Music Fan ![]() ![]() Joined: 01 April 2005 Status: Offline Points: 23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes, the labels and numbers are confusing! I made the best attempt that I could on tracking those down. I used a number
of different sources, including most of those posted above. We seriously considered leaving the numbers out for that very reason, but decided to go with what we thought was correct. I certainly have no problem in making corrections where they may be needed. Not sure how many people even care about that info (especially nowadays when most people obtain things digitally), but we tried our best under a tight deadline! Edited by Paul Haney |
|
![]() |
|
Paul Haney ![]() Music Fan ![]() ![]() Joined: 01 April 2005 Status: Offline Points: 23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I should also note that even the Billboard chart department has been struggling in recent years with these
issues. That's one reason why they no longer show such info on their charts. They even have a hard time coming to a consensus on some song titles and artist billings! Not like the old days when we could just look at one physical configuration (single and/or album). |
|
![]() |
|
Chartman ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 26 February 2016 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's like most songs have three different labels listed - everyone wants a piece of the action. Have noticed that Billboard often switches up the labels listed on their charts through a songs run. Have you looked at the number of songwriters listed. Some spanish songs have 10 writers each with four names in their individual names. Another issue is that an artist will release a deluxe or special edition of a popular CD that includes only a new song or two but has a different label number. Suppose that new song makes the rock chart. Are you going to list a different label number for the same CD just for that new song? A problem that is pronounced in the alternative world is the releasing of a digital only song which then becomes popular. So they release an EP, then a year later a full fledge album that contains the song. Case in point, "Broken" by lovelytheband was first released as a single in April 2017. Started getting some airplay so they released an EP (Everything I Could Never Say) in September 2017, Became a big hit so they released the album "Finding It Hard To Smile" in August 2018. You listed that last album in your book, however while it's true the song is on the album, the album wasn't available when most were listening to the song. There are many other examples of this situation occurring. Reminds me of the situation where they would release a 45 of a song not available on an album so you had to buy the 45. Then a few months later, an album came out that contained the song. Weren't the Beatles famous for releasing 45 only songs? Edited by Chartman |
|
![]() |
|
Paul Haney ![]() Music Fan ![]() ![]() Joined: 01 April 2005 Status: Offline Points: 23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes, there are numerous issues with physical product these days. This entire project was done in just a few months and I
just couldn't spend hours looking up a single album (I probably spent too much time cross-checking some as it was). Maybe we should've just left the numbers out, but I thought it was important to show them and at least give our readers a place to start if they did want to track down the physical product. Again, not sure if it was worth the effort I did put in as most people just download the songs anyway. Edited by Paul Haney |
|
![]() |
|
kingofskiffle ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 19 November 2018 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think it is a good idea to include and your right it is at least a place to
start. Most do download but suppose the download of the album isn’t available? Or downloading isn’t an option. I think it’s always worth the effort. Looking forward to my copy when it arrives (don’t live in the US so international post awaits) |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 789 |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |