![]() |
Brenton Wood - The Oogum Boogum Song |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
davidclark
Music Fan
Joined: 17 November 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 46 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Brenton Wood - The Oogum Boogum SongPosted: 03 May 2006 at 4:10am |
|
Pat,
can you tell me the difference between the stereo LP and mono 45 version of this track? There is a difference due to the mix (same for "Gimme Little Sign") and the 45 fades early, but is there anything else different? I also see the 45 version has appeared in stereo of late! thanks. Edited by davidclark |
|
|
dc1
|
|
![]() |
|
Pat Downey
Admin Group
Joined: 01 October 2003 Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 May 2006 at 4:29pm |
|
David, there are :09 edited out of the LP version starting at 1:42 to get the 45 version.
|
|
![]() |
|
jimct
Music Fan
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 April 2010 at 12:16pm |
|
My commercial 45, confirmed as Double Shot 111, has a listed time of (2:20), but an actual time of (2:24). My 45 is vinyl, with deadwax info of "DS-120".
Edited by jimct |
|
![]() |
|
TomDiehl1
Music Fan
Joined: 13 January 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 April 2011 at 2:49am |
|
I have two pressings of this 45. Both are commercial stock copies of Double Shot 111.
The first is styrene, has a listed time of (2:20) but an actual time of (2:31). It also plays in stereo (that was a REAL shock for me -- apparently i've never played this copy before). The deadwax reads DS-120 R-3732 and has a machine stamped symbol that is reminiscent of the Columbia records logo... My other pressing of the 45 (which I would assume to be the earlier pressing) erroneously lists the artist as BRENTON WOODS, is vinyl, plays in mono...it also has a listed time of (2:20), but an actual time of (2:25). The deadwax on this pressing has: DS-120 DS-111 R-894. Edited by TomDiehl1 |
|
|
Live in stereo.
|
|
![]() |
|
Pat Downey
Admin Group
Joined: 01 October 2003 Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 April 2011 at 5:41pm |
|
Would Double Shot records be issuing a stereo 45 in 1967? My guess is that the stereo version is a much later reissue with the same catalog number.
|
|
![]() |
|
Hykker
Music Fan
Joined: 30 October 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 33 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 April 2011 at 3:01pm |
|
My copy fits the description of Jim's except that mine is styrene. Don't think I've ever seen a vinyl single on Double Shot.
|
|
![]() |
|
TomDiehl1
Music Fan
Joined: 13 January 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 April 2011 at 10:03pm |
I tend to agree with you...however aside from listing the artist name correctly, the label information is identical to my vinyl pressing...right down to the (213) HO 6-9594 phone number. The label was sold in 1972 to Original Sound and I'd assume the pressing is from no later than then, but one never knows.... |
|
|
Live in stereo.
|
|
![]() |
|
jimct
Music Fan
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 April 2011 at 5:22am |
|
I believe that the Double Shot label kept their few hit 45s "in print" well
into the 70s and 80s themselves, by simply re-pressing and re- distributing more 45 copies to retail - they remained a very small, but still active label during these years. To me, they had a similar business model (small, but existing for many years) to Gene Norman's GNP Crescendo label. These re-presses all kept the original Double Shot catalog #s. The label's biggest hit, "Psychotic Reaction" is the most easy-to-obtain example of this. I bought what appeared to be a brand new, never-been- played 45 copy of it, back in the 80s. The shop owner (a friend of mine) confirmed that he ordered the copy I bought from his local oldies 45 distributor. it had a different label type-face than the original 60s 45, and was pressed on a very-lightweight styrene that I don't remember 45s being pressed on during the 60s. Tom, I am 90%+ sure that your stereo 45 copy of "Oogum Boogum Song" is another example of this "later re- press with original stock #" practice by Double Shot. |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |