![]()  | 
 
Janet Jackson - "Nasty" | 
 
    Post Reply  
   | 
  Page 123> | 
| Author | |
   
   crapfromthepast  
   
   Music Fan  
    
   Joined: 14 September 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 162  | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
      Quote   Reply
   
     Topic: Janet Jackson - "Nasty"Posted: 04 December 2007 at 7:41pm  | 
 
| 
   
    
   Here are instructions for creating the 45 edit from the LP version on Control:
 
   
  Keep 0:00.0-0:01.2 of the LP version. That's "Gimme a beat." Edit out the silence between 0:01.2-0:01.4. That's right - the 45 tightens up the gap between "Gimme a beat" and said beat. It's actually about 0.24 seconds of audio that's removed. Keep the 8 beats between 0:01.4-0:06.1. Edit on downbeat. Remove the 8 beats from 0:06.1-0:10.7. Keep the 2 beats from 0:10.7-0:11.3. Edit on snare. Remove the 8 beats from 0:11.3-0:15.9. Keep the 8 beats from 0:15.9-0:20.6. Edit on snare. Remove the 16 beats from 0:20.6-0:29.8. Keep 0:29.8-4:03.4 (end) of LP version. Your mixdown will have edits at 0:01.2, 0:05.8, 0:06.4 and 0:11.1, and will run 3:44.6. The true 45 and the Control CD version run about the same speed, at 103.7 or 103.8 BPM.  | 
 |
![]()  | 
 |
   
   aaronk  
   
   Admin Group  
   Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 263  | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
      Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 05 December 2007 at 12:16am | 
 
| 
   
    
   As discussed in another thread, the exact 45 version of "Nasty" can't be re-created from the LP version, because of a "wind" sound effect on the LP version that isn't on the 45.  The sound effect is somewhere near the 2 1/2 minute mark right before the line "Nastyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy boys." 
   
  Edited by aaronk  | 
 |
![]()  | 
 |
   
   Brian W.  
   
   Music Fan  
   Joined: 13 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 40  | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
      Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 05 December 2007 at 3:02am | 
 
| 
   
    
   I think you're short a "y" there, Aaron.
    
   
   | 
 |
![]()  | 
 |
   
   Todd Ireland  
   
   Music Fan  
   Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23  | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
      Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 05 December 2007 at 9:29am | 
 
| 
   
    
   LOL  :-)
    
   
   | 
 |
![]()  | 
 |
   
   aaronk  
   
   Admin Group  
   Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 263  | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
      Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 05 December 2007 at 12:01pm | 
 
| 
   
    
   I just edited my post and added the extra "y."  Good catch, Brian! 
   
  Edited by aaronk  | 
 |
![]()  | 
 |
   
   Todd Ireland  
   
   Music Fan  
   Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23  | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
      Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 05 December 2007 at 3:43pm | 
 
| 
   
    
   ROFL  Maybe we could call this: (45 version with extra "y" in "Nastyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy")!
    
   
   | 
 |
![]()  | 
 |
   
   eriejwg  
   
   Music Fan  
    
   Joined: 10 June 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 111  | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
      Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 05 December 2007 at 4:37pm | 
 
| 
   
    
   This post has turned funnyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy...or, did I forget a 'y'?
    
   
   | 
 |
![]()  | 
 |
   
   crapfromthepast  
   
   Music Fan  
    
   Joined: 14 September 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 162  | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
      Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 09 September 2011 at 6:43am | 
 
| 
   
    
   For some reason, this post shows up on a search for "nasty" but not "janet nasty" or "janet jackson nasty".  Odd.
 
   
  I wasted a bunch of time recreating the 45 edit, which is detailed above, only to realize the 45 is a very slight remix of the LP version. I think the drums on the 45 have more effects on them than the LP version. To my ears, they're just "bigger" on the 45. At the waveform level, it looks to me like the attack on the snare is shaped a little differently, with a little more sustain, but I'd like a second opinion. By the way, the true 45 mix (if it is indeed a different mix) is on The "A" List Disc 33, which uses the same analog transfer as GoldDisc 936, only with its absolute polarity inverted. Both run at 103.8 BPM throughout, both appear to have noise reduction, and I'd guess that both are originally taken from vinyl. These two match my 45 exactly.  | 
 |
![]()  | 
 |
   
   elcoleccionista  
   
   Music Fan  
   Joined: 28 November 2005 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 8  | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
      Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 05 June 2015 at 11:14am | 
 
| 
   
    
   The 45 mix can be found on this German compilation as 
 
   
  well. It is definitely not taken from vinyl, no noise reduction, sibilance or background noise. http://www.discogs.com/Various-High-Life- B%C3%A4renstark/release/1036229  | 
 |
![]()  | 
 |
   
   Underground Dub  
   
   Music Fan  
   Joined: 10 July 2006 Status: Offline Points: 0  | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
      Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 08 June 2015 at 5:04pm | 
 
| 
   
    
   Great find, elcoleccionista!
    
   
   | 
 |
![]()  | 
 |
    Post Reply  
   | 
  Page 123> | 
| Tweet | 
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions  ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum  |