Top 40 Music on CD Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Top 40 Music On Compact Disc > Chat Board
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Toby Beau-"My Angel Baby"
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Toby Beau-"My Angel Baby"

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
jimct View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jimct Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Toby Beau-"My Angel Baby"
    Posted: 11 January 2007 at 4:55am
There is a (3:28) to (3:36) CD length range for this, including a (:17 seconds longer than the 45 or LP) notation next to its appearance on the (3:53) "Very Best Of" CD. I just did the math - that means the 45 runs (3:36). But my commercial 45 has a listed time of (3:27), but an actual time of (3:30).
Back to Top
sriv94 View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 16 September 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sriv94 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 January 2007 at 8:32am
It was Class Reunion 1978 at Jim's this early morning. :)

Love it, love it, love it.

Doug
---------------
All of the good signatures have been taken.
Back to Top
Pat Downey View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 01 October 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pat Downey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 January 2007 at 3:33pm
My dj copy of "My Angel Baby" states (3:27) and runs (3:27). Jim are you sure your commercial copy states (3:27) and runs (3:30)?
Back to Top
jimct View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jimct Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 January 2007 at 1:25am
Pat, since you asked me to double-check my findings, I am happy to stopwatch it for you a second time. Once again, my results indicate an actual time of exactly (3:30). I did specify in my earlier post that these results were for my commercial 45, for which my deadwax info is PB-11250-A-10. I did not previously time my promo 45 for this one, but I do have it. Since your last post cites promo 45 timings, I have just pulled and timed both the mono and stereo sides of my promo 45 for you. Like my commercial 45, both sides of my promo 45 indicate a listed time of (3:27). The mono side of my promo DOES actually run (3:27)(deadwax PA-11250-C-10), confirming your promo 45 timing results. But, to my shock, the stereo side of my promo 45 actually timed in at a whopping (4:12), far longer than any CD appearance, with a deadwax of PB-11250-A. Truthfully, Pat, during my "1978 timing project" last week, I had OFTEN been stumbling upon VERY minor timing differences between my stock and my promo 45 versions, which all featured different deadwax info from each other. For example, both my S Bishop-"Everybody Needs Love" stock 45, and both sides of my promo 45s, all have a listed time of (3:25). The stock 45 runs (3:31), which I reported. But the promo 45 has actual times of (3:31) mono, and (3:33) stereo, which I did not report. For G Lightfoot-"The Circle Is Small", my stock 45 and both sides of my promo 45 all show a listed time of (3:51). My commercial 45 actually runs (3:51), which I reported. But, the mono side of my promo 45 has an actual time of (3:54), while the stereo side of my promo 45 actually runs (3:49). I did not report these promo 45 findings. I thought these differences to be very minor in nature, and would serve to confuse more than help anybody, and was simply "too much information." I believe most folks who read the Board are primarily concerned about the COMMERCIAL 45's listed/actual timings, which I always try to provide, while offering up unique promo 45 details ONLY when they become fairly significant in nature. I know how "minute-detail-oriented" most of us are here, but even WE end up having to draw the line somewhere!
Back to Top
crapfromthepast View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 14 September 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 60
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote crapfromthepast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 May 2009 at 4:33pm
Found a seriously defective version of this track on Time-Life's Body Talk - After Dark (R834-11, 1997).

It starts out OK, but the fidelity starts to deteriorate halfway through the song, and there's some serious tape drag on top of all that.

I envision the recording engineer staring dumbstruck at a big pile of tape oxide on the floor after playing this...

It's about as bad as the defective version of John Parr's "Naughty Naughty".

For a much better-sounding version, use Rhino's Have A Nice Day Vol. 25.

Edited by crapfromthepast
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
Back to Top
EdisonLite View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 18 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 203
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote EdisonLite Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 May 2009 at 8:31pm
Speaking of this sort of thing, I find certain recordings, during their fades, get very muffled sounding, and I wonder why that is. It may be on the original vinyl recordings, too, but I've noticed it on CDs. What I'm hearing, as the song fades during the last 5 seconds or so, it's like someone is also dropping down the treble more and more (I suppose to hide tape hiss?) but it sounds very unnatural to me, and I wonder if anyone else has heard this on CDs and what the real reason is that this is done. I can't recall what songs exactly (although every song on the Rubinoos first album does this!)
Back to Top
eriejwg View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 71
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote eriejwg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 May 2009 at 10:17pm
My thought was that it is some sort of noise reduction.
Back to Top
Santi Paradoa View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 17 February 2009
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Santi Paradoa Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 August 2020 at 5:20pm
Has anyone found that stereo promo 45 that runs 4:12 on
a CD anywhere (perhaps on an import)?
Santi Paradoa

Miami, Florida
Back to Top
crapfromthepast View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan
Avatar

Joined: 14 September 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 60
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote crapfromthepast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 August 2020 at 6:08pm
Sorry, Santi. I only have the Have A Nice Day version.

But, to address EdisonLite's 11-year-old question, the loss of treble on the fade is exactly the hallmark of noise reduction. The real two-track mixdown tapes retain the high end even as the volume drops, until the volume level falls below the tape hiss. I try to avoid noise reduction wherever possible. Most of the Rhino, Time-Life, Warner Special Products, Razor & Tie, and Madacy CDs that we discuss here on the board don't have widespread noise reduction, which is good. It does turn up on a few clunky tracks, and we try to call attention to them in these posts.
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.