![]() |
Maxine Brown - Funny |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
davidclark
Music Fan
Joined: 17 November 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 46 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Maxine Brown - FunnyPosted: 13 March 2009 at 10:03am |
|
speaking of Maxine Brown, "Funny" timings in the database range from 2:17 to 2:32. Anyone can time the 45 and/or the LP to determine the 45 timing and if the LP ran longer, or if the longer stereo version came later?
|
|
|
dc1
|
|
![]() |
|
jimct
Music Fan
Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 March 2009 at 12:44pm |
|
David, my commercial 45, confirmed as Nomar 106, has a listed time of (2:18) and an actual time of (2:19). Hope you had a great "David Clark's annual, month-long Thailand trip" this year, my good friend, and that everything else is also going well!
Edited by jimct |
|
![]() |
|
Todd Ireland
Music Fan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 March 2009 at 10:07am |
|
Ditto that... Welcome back, David!
|
|
![]() |
|
Todd Ireland
Music Fan
Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 December 2010 at 12:15am |
|
It looks like Maxine Brown's "Funny" didn't emerge on a vinyl LP until 1963, approximately two years after the the song charted as a 45. Does anyone have The Fabulous Sound of Maxine Brown LP who can pass along the song's run time on it? I'm wondering if this may be the longer 2:29-2:32 stereo length that has routinely appeared on CD.
Edited by Todd Ireland |
|
![]() |
|
edtop40
Music Fan
Joined: 29 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 15 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 December 2012 at 7:12pm |
|
the version on the cd 'greatest hits' issued as curb 77829
sounds like a re-recording.....pat can you compare that cd version to others and see if it IS a re-recording....the wind instrument (oboe) on the intro sounds completely different....thx |
|
|
edtop40
|
|
![]() |
|
MMathews
Music Fan
Joined: 18 August 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 December 2012 at 10:52pm |
|
Good catch Ed...
i was wondering about the time difference too. The song ends cold, so a 10 sec time difference would mean a massive pitch change. Well, i tried synching them.. and they don't synch. The tempos are too different. The stereo version that run 2:30-ish are not the hit 45 version, they are a re-recording. It's not just the intro (flute? oboe?) .. they are different. Then when you compare little vocal details, like at about :27 in the mono she sings "really...i think i'm over you" she says "I" quickly, but in the stereo, she drags it out like "I-y-eeeee think i'm over you" with a long "I". After that the little differences add up, all the way to cold end. The horns in the big finish are completely different at the end. I heard the stereo version years ago on LP but just never a/b'd so i never noticed. MM |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |