![]() |
John Denver - "Calypso" |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 4> |
Author | |
jimct ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 13 June 2013 at 8:43am |
More than anything, this post is simply to "poll the brain cells" of my
fellow T4MOC-ers. #2 has always seemed to me to be *way* too high a BB peak position for this song in 1975. This is nothing personal - I like the record. All of the CT Top 40 stations exclusively played the originally-intended A-side of the 45, "I'm Sorry", and did very well with it. None of them ever officially added "Calypso." (I never even heard them "spike it" on-air.) I first discovered that I thought what was simply a great B-side was becoming a hit in its own right, was when Casey Kasem played it on AT40. If I recall correctly, "Calypso" shared its entire Hot 100 chart run with "I'm Sorry." And, checking the chart sites, there were surely 8-10 US markets where "Calypso" was a big hit, and charted Top 10 on their survey. But, in total, "I'm Sorry" has appeared on over 150 surveys, while "Calypso" shows up on just 52. That jives with my overall gut feeling about the song - that it should probably show as a Top 10 to 20 peaking song. But #2? I am curious how "the chart powers that be" ended up arriving at the "Calypso" ultimate chart position? Was there human judgement involved on this, after the fact? The RR volume I use the most (due to numerous pencil notations I have in it) has "I'm Sorry" as the #32 biggest hit for 1975, with "Calypso" right behind, at #36. I was listening to Top 40 quite a bit back then, and I was certainly aware that "Calypso" was getting solid Top 40 airplay. But, like with all double-sided hits, how do you know which side the buyer is buying it for? An individual 45 side's Top 40 radio airplay was far easier to observe/document. Although I know our buddy Paul Haney had nothing to do with compiling the Hot 100 charts back in 1975 (or ever), perhaps he can chime in on how RR arrived at its ultimate 1975 Pop Annual placing for "Calypso", and how they've determined it to be 99% as big a hit as "I'm Sorry" was. I'm positive there are legitimate reasons for it - I just don't happen to know what they are! No hurry, Paul. Whenever you get time. :) Any other opinions? Edited by jimct |
|
![]() |
|
EdisonLite ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 18 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 191 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
All I can say is I heard "Calypso" all the time on the radio back in 1975. I listened to Boston and Providence, RI stations (not too far from CT!), where "Calypso" was a big hit. Having not even known about Billboard as a kid then, I would have guessed (if someone asked me) that "Calypso" peaked between #3 and #5, just based on how often I heard it. Certainly didn't feel like a #10-#20 hit. Also, I did my own personal charts (starting in 1974), and on my chart it peaked at #3! Not that my chart was supposed to be a ranking of how often I heard a song on the radio (it was a ranking of how much I liked a song), but ... to get to #3, I think that would only happen if I was hearing it a lot. Of course, I can only react as a person who heard it in my market. If there were other cities in the US not playing it, I wouldn't know. All I can say is ... it felt like a big radio hit to me. And it's true Jim, no magazine can ever predict which side of a 45 a person is buying it for (when both are played on the radio.) Kinda like how Billboard can't determine if people are viewing Rebecca Black's "Friday" on YouTube because they think it's a joke or because they love the song and think it's an amazing piece of songwriting. (And had Billboard had its current chart policies in use back three years ago, I think "Friday" would have been a #1 hit - because no one was buying it but everyone was viewing it as a joke (basically) when checking it out on YouTube.
Edited by EdisonLite |
|
![]() |
|
AndrewChouffi ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 24 September 2005 Status: Offline Points: 20 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
To Jim:
"Calypso" received a #2 position in Joel Whitburn's books because of Record Research's current policy of assigning a peak position to a nominally tag-along b-side if there was a time when Billboard switched its A-side position. "I'm Sorry" (alone) debuted on the Hot 10 August 16, 1975; made it to #1 without a bullet September 27. Radio stations began to play "Calypso" & RCA began to push it (very similar to "Undun" by the Guess Who). "I'm Sorry" dropped to #2 the following week. By the week of October 11, 1975 Billboard apparently decided that the promotion on "Calypso" was so strong they listed the record as "Calypso/I'm Sorry" where it remained at #2 for four more weeks! Competing chart 'Cashbox' was charting double-sided hits separately at the time and took "Calypso" up to #26. It's always been hard to assign a chart position to a double-sided hit because each side sells the exact same amount of copies! "Calypso" did receive a very decent amount of airplay, as a matter of fact on the 1975 Radio & Records year-end Pop/75 of '75 chart it was listed as "Calypso/I'm Sorry" instead of the other way around. Andy Edited by AndrewChouffi |
|
![]() |
|
jono ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 26 September 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I remember hearing "Calypso" a lot in the Milwaukee area around that
time, but not sure if it was played more or less than the flip side (I was only 9). I do know that "Calypso" made a bigger impression on me, probably because of the video from his tv special (I think), where there were scenes from being on Jacques Cousteau's ship (first time I heard it). If nothing else, that song is more embedded in my memory than "I'm Sorry", and I would've guessed had a higher chart position (to me, catchier as well, although I wouldn't want to try to sing along). But again I was 9 and a song with a video about a ship would've been more exciting to me than an apologetic, confessional song. My parents had the album, but I would've bought the 45 for "Calypso", for what it's worth. Jon O. |
|
![]() |
|
80smusicfreak ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 14 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quoting you from a George Harrison thread just a couple days ago, but I, too, have always subscribed to that same reasoning. And in this case, I feel that Christopher G. Feldman covered your question quite well in his 2000 softcover book, The Billboard Book of No. 2 Singles (Billboard Books; ISBN no. 0-8230-7695-4). Half a page is devoted to this two-sided hit from '75, and in fact AndrewChouffi's post above almost reads like a more condensed version of Feldman's explanation. Unfortunately, the book is now out-of-print; I obtained mine brand new, directly from Feldman himself on eBay about five years ago. (He also signed it before shipping it out to me, lol.) Definitely a fun read; recommended... And while I lived in Northern California at the time, I definitely concur w/ the first four sentences of EdisonLite's post above... |
|
![]() |
|
jimct ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Andy/80s music freak/Gordon/jono, thank you. Your
explanations/background was very helpful to me. Jono, I do agree - Calypso *was* the more much memorable side. I especially found the part about when Billboard listed the two as "Calypso/I'm Sorry", in that order, while it held the #2 spot on the Hot 100, to be quite significant. To me, that's a "slam dunk" reason to have it be exactly where it is: Peaking at #2. I did try to present some relevant facts. The best, non-BB, 1975 radio chart info that I know to be available. The 150+ surveys (I'm Sorry), vs 52 surveys (Calypso) is fact, not opinion. It's a large difference. True, it's not a scientifically accurate sample. But it's the best of what's out there. If Calypso was on 150+ surveys, and I'm Sorry only 52, I would've asked the exact same question. That being said, I still think, at some point, that the human element came into play, and made a "which title first, chart judgement call." But then again, I'm sure such things happened every single week, during Hot 100 prep! Edited by jimct |
|
![]() |
|
TomDiehl1 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 13 January 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I first heard the record in the early 90's when I was a kid. By that, I mean, Calypso. It was on some radio show on NPR, I think..... that side really grabbed me immediately and later when I found the 45, I played I'm Sorry once, and that was it.... I didn't like that side as much, if at all.
However, in all of my years hunting down promo 45s, I've never seen a promo 45 with Calypso on it. I've only come across mono/stereo promos of I'm Sorry, and I might even have one of those in my collection even though I don't care for the song.... |
|
Live in stereo.
|
|
![]() |
|
jimct ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tom, a "Calypso" promo 45 does exist. I just pulled it for you. It has
"Calypso" on both sides; both sides are stereo. Both sides have a listed time of (3:29), and an actual time of (3:33). Both my stock copies show a slightly different listed time (3:32), but they also run (3:33). |
|
![]() |
|
Todd Ireland ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 16 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I can remember hearing "Calypso" for the first time on the radio sometime in the early '80s when I was a kid and quickly fell in love with the song. Funny story... I was a fan of the Smurfs cartoon series at the time and I could swear I thought John Denver was singing "Azraeeeel dooooo doo-doo-doo-doo" during the song's chorus. Azrael of course was the feline nemesis of the Smurfs! :-)
Edited by Todd Ireland |
|
![]() |
|
Paul Haney ![]() Music Fan ![]() ![]() Joined: 01 April 2005 Status: Offline Points: 40 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sorry that I'm late to this "Calypso" party, but Andy pretty much nailed the BB explanation above. It's interesting to note that Mr. Whitburn has since revised his thinking on this one. He always thought that the #2 peak was too high for this particular song, so we now show "Calypso" as a "tag-along" B-side for 10 weeks, with no actual chart position. It's cases like this one where I wish Billboard would've kept the songs separate like Cash Box did at the time.
As for my personal experience, I don't remember hearing "Calypso" much on my local Top 40s at the time (certainly nowhere near as much as "I'm Sorry"). In fact, I was quite surprised when Casey started playing it on AT40. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 4> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |