Top 40 Music on CD Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Top 40 Music On Compact Disc > Chat Board
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Amy Grant - "Baby Baby"
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Amy Grant - "Baby Baby"

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 9>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Todd Ireland View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Todd Ireland Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 March 2025 at 11:16pm
Originally posted by aaronk aaronk wrote:

I have no problem mentioning the CD single, Todd, and perhaps the forthcoming "version table" will help make things even clearer. The main thing I've been trying to get straight is the broad policy about what we are considering to be the "official" single version.

Another reason we've always gone with "dominant" single format is because sometimes, especially in the early '90s, there might have been cases where a vinyl 45 and cassette single were released that had different A-side versions (for instance, the cassette single has an edit while the vinyl 45 has the full LP version). But in 1992, practially nobody was buying vinyl 45s anymore. Therefore, it's irrelevant to consider what version is on the vinyl 45 when it comes to labeling database CDs with the "45 version" (aka "single version"). In that example, CDs that have the edit would be considered the "official single version."

This is also what I was alluding to earlier about labeling these as "single version" in the database instead of "45 version," because to me it becomes confusing when you see "45 version" but really mean whatever version was on the A-side of the cassette single. Hopefully, it's starting to become clearer, and I'd love to hear what others think about this.


It is all becoming clearer to me now, Aaron, and I agree with everything you're saying in your analysis. Also, I tend to prefer using the term "single version" over "45 version" for the reasons you state and am glad to know that it may not be such a terrible ordeal to switch out these terms throughout the entire database.

I'm sure I'll have even more comments once the forthcoming "version table" platform is implemented. For now, I think I've opined enough and also would like to see more forum members weigh in with their own thoughts and opinions. So how 'bout it, guys!
Back to Top
sheardbeard View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 05 March 2025
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sheardbeard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 March 2025 at 5:23pm
I’m most definitely the noobiest of the noobs to this forum, but I’m also for
considering Side A/Track 1 of whatever the dominant single format
happened to be at the time as the “official single version“. So, “Baby Baby”
– cassette single - “LP version” is our winner here :)

Edited by sheardbeard
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 307
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 March 2025 at 2:03pm
I have no problem mentioning the CD single, Todd, and perhaps the forthcoming "version table" will help make things even clearer. The main thing I've been trying to get straight is the broad policy about what we are considering to be the "official" single version.

Another reason we've always gone with "dominant" single format is because sometimes, especially in the early '90s, there might have been cases where a vinyl 45 and cassette single were released that had different A-side versions (for instance, the cassette single has an edit while the vinyl 45 has the full LP version). But in 1992, practially nobody was buying vinyl 45s anymore. Therefore, it's irrelevant to consider what version is on the vinyl 45 when it comes to labeling database CDs with the "45 version" (aka "single version"). In that example, CDs that have the edit would be considered the "official single version."

This is also what I was alluding to earlier about labeling these as "single version" in the database instead of "45 version," because to me it becomes confusing when you see "45 version" but really mean whatever version was on the A-side of the cassette single. Hopefully, it's starting to become clearer, and I'd love to hear what others think about this.

Edited by aaronk
Back to Top
Todd Ireland View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Todd Ireland Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 March 2025 at 2:03pm
Originally posted by aaronk aaronk wrote:

Originally posted by Todd Ireland Todd Ireland wrote:

Assuming that we're sticking with a policy stating that Side A/Track 1 on a commercial 2-track single format release is considered the "official" single version

I think this is where the confusion has come in. The policy since the beginning has not been just that it's on any commercial 2-track single; it's that the dominant 2-track single at the time is considered to be the one with the "official" single version. That means for songs charting between 1955 to around 1989 (maybe Ed or Paul H. can verify), it's the vinyl 45. From around 1990 to 1995, we've considered it to be the cassette single. And from 1996 until things went to downloads it was the 2-track CD single. Again, someone would need to verify the actual dates/years, as I'm not 100% sure. Whenever there wasn't a 2-track single on one of those formats during that time period, we've defaulted to something else, like a maxi single or 12" single.

That means in the case of "Baby Baby," since the cassette single has the LP version as the A-side, that would be considered the "official" single version and therefore no database designation is needed for CDs containing the LP version (45 and LP are the same). If collectively we want to change this policy, that would definitely mean making numerous database updates.


Ok, I gotcha now. I don't really have a problem with that, although I agree that we probably should determine for certain which format was the dominant one for each year from approximately 1988 to 2000. I think we can glean some valuable and accurate information for this from the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) figures below (which, by the way, was just newly updated with figures through 2024):

https://www.riaa.com/u-s-sales-database/
Back to Top
Todd Ireland View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Todd Ireland Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 March 2025 at 1:52pm
Originally posted by Todd Ireland Todd Ireland wrote:

Originally posted by Brian W. Brian W. wrote:

[QUOTE=Todd Ireland]
Therefore, "Baby Baby" is a case in which the
song was issued on multiple commercial single formats, and
yet at least one of them -- the commercial CD single --
features a different version as Side A/Track 1 than the
others.


It's my recollection that the US CD single for "Baby Baby" was not issued until months after the song was a hit, after it was off the chart. I know it says 1991 in Discogs, but of
course it would, that's when the the songs on it are copyrighted. It's my recollection that it was issued quite some time after the song was a hit, possibly even 1992 or 1993.

Additionally, I would consider the US CD single to be a maxi-single, since it has three tracks plus the extended version, whereas the cassingle and 7" each only had two tracks.


Ooooh, ok... If that's indeed the case, Brian, then I would agree that this pretty much negates the need for any mention of the commercial CD single release in the database, thus negating the need for any sort of single version/album version distinction for "Baby Baby".

So, unless there's anything else to consider here, then you can just disregard everything in my previous post, Aaron! LOL

Edited by Todd Ireland
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 307
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 March 2025 at 1:51pm
Originally posted by Todd Ireland Todd Ireland wrote:

Assuming that we're sticking with a policy stating that Side A/Track 1 on a commercial 2-track single format release is considered the "official" single version

I think this is where the confusion has come in. The policy since the beginning has not been just that it's on any commercial 2-track single; it's that the dominant 2-track single at the time is considered to be the one with the "official" single version. That means for songs charting between 1955 to around 1989 (maybe Ed or Paul H. can verify), it's the vinyl 45. From around 1990 to 1995, we've considered it to be the cassette single. And from 1996 until things went to downloads it was the 2-track CD single. Again, someone would need to verify the actual dates/years, as I'm not 100% sure. Whenever there wasn't a 2-track single on one of those formats during that time period, we've defaulted to something else, like a maxi single or 12" single.

That means in the case of "Baby Baby," since the cassette single has the LP version as the A-side, that would be considered the "official" single version and therefore no database designation is needed for CDs containing the LP version (45 and LP are the same). If collectively we want to change this policy, that would definitely mean making numerous database updates.
Back to Top
Brian W. View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 13 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 46
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Brian W. Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 March 2025 at 1:42pm
Originally posted by Todd Ireland Todd Ireland wrote:


Therefore, "Baby Baby" is a case in which the
song was issued on multiple commercial single formats, and
yet at least one of them -- the commercial CD single --
features a different version as Side A/Track 1 than the
others.


It's my recollection that the US CD single for "Baby Baby" was not issued until months after the song was a hit, after it was off the chart. I know it says 1991 in Discogs, but of
course it would, that's when the the songs on it are copyrighted. It's my recollection that it was issued quite some time after the song was a hit, possibly even 1992 or 1993.

Additionally, I would consider the US CD single to be a maxi-single, since it has three tracks plus the extended version, whereas the cassingle and 7" each only had two tracks.

Edited by Brian W.
Back to Top
Todd Ireland View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Todd Ireland Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 March 2025 at 1:08pm
Assuming that we're sticking with a policy stating that Side A/Track 1 on a commercial 2-track single format release is considered the "official" single version, then here is what we have with "Baby Baby":

Cassette single = LP Version (A-side)
Vinyl 45 = LP version (A-side)
CD single = "7-Inch Heart in Motion Mix" (Track 1)

Therefore, "Baby Baby" is a case in which the song was issued on multiple commercial single formats, and yet at least one of them -- the commercial CD single -- features a different version as Side A/Track 1 than the others. Going back and reviewing the title notes currently listed in the database for "Baby Baby", it appears that the commercial CD single information is missing and, therefore, I suspect this is what's causing the confusion here. (I could swear, though, I thought you had mentioned info at one point, Aaron, but evidently it's now gone.)

Perhaps you might also be confusing the commercial CD single with the promo CD single, which is why I recommended just listing the contents of the promo CD single separately (or at least for Tracks 1-3 since we've established that those are the ones that got the most Top 40 radio airplay) in the title notes, along with the featured lead track on each of the individual commercial single formats (cassette single, CD single, and vinyl 45), like we've always done. I know it's a lot of information and a bit of a headache to read through, but I think this may be the only way we avoid further confusion. I'll leave it up to you to decide whether or not you think it's then necessary to make detailed comments for individual CDs ("LP, cassette single, and vinyl 45 version" vs. "CD single version").

Edited by Todd Ireland
Back to Top
aaronk View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 307
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aaronk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 March 2025 at 9:00am
Originally posted by Todd Ireland Todd Ireland wrote:

I very much agree with this as well. We're just trying to figure out how best to deal with situations like "Baby Baby" in which the song is issued on multiple commercial single formats, yet at least one of them features a different version on Side A/Track 1 than the others. We'd like to have other forum members share their thoughts and opinions on this as well.

Correct me if I'm wrong but "Baby Baby" isn't an exception when talking about '90s hits. There are hundreds more examples where this happened, which is why I wanted to avoid the slippery slope. Using Madonna's "Secret" as another recent example, no designation is listed for database CDs with the LP version, as the commercial 2-track singles (45, cassette, 2-track CD) all use the LP version as the lead track. The fact that the maxi CD and 12" have a different lead track should not be a reason to re-label the non-described database CDs with a wordy designator that describes all the 2-track singles. Do you agree?
Back to Top
Todd Ireland View Drop Down
Music Fan
Music Fan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Todd Ireland Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 March 2025 at 12:37am
Originally posted by prisdeej prisdeej wrote:

Originally posted by aaronk aaronk wrote:


That's why in this case I think it's probably best to stick
with what the database (and book) has shown since the
beginning: no designation in cases where the "official
single version" (aka "45 version") is the same as the LP
version.


Aaron, I agree wholeheartedly here. Thanks!


I very much agree with this as well. We're just trying to figure out how best to deal with situations like "Baby Baby" in which the song is issued on multiple commercial single formats, yet at least one of them features a different version on Side A/Track 1 than the others. We'd like to have other forum members share their thoughts and opinions on this as well.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 9>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.066 seconds.