<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Top 40 Music on CD Forum : Billboard HOT 100 Methogology 1958</title>
  <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; Top 40 Music on CD Forum : Chat Board  : Billboard HOT 100 Methogology 1958]]></description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2015 15:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=8317</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Billboard HOT 100 Methogology 1958 : Thnx Paul and Hykker,  Then the...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8317&amp;PID=43285&amp;title=billboard-hot-100-methogology-1958#43285</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=675">Chatfan MA</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 8317<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 14&nbsp;March&nbsp;2015 at 3:00pm<br /><br />Thnx Paul and Hykker,<br /><br />Then the formula was probably the same as with the TOP 100 <br />... a combination of charts retail sales, sales in juke <br />box and airplay by djs <br /><br />some evaluations I made for pleasure for the time when <br />there were these three charts and the TOP 100 <br />simultaneously , the position in the TOP 100 was most <br />times identical with the average of positions for the same <br />title in all three charts.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2015 15:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8317&amp;PID=43285&amp;title=billboard-hot-100-methogology-1958#43285</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Billboard HOT 100 Methogology 1958 :   Paul Haney wrote:  Weighted...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8317&amp;PID=43270&amp;title=billboard-hot-100-methogology-1958#43270</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=193">Hykker</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 8317<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 13&nbsp;March&nbsp;2015 at 7:28am<br /><br /> <table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><img src="forum_images/quote_box.png" title="Originally posted by Paul Haney" alt="Originally posted by Paul Haney" style="vertical-align: text-bottom;" /> <strong>Paul Haney wrote:</strong><br /><br /><br /><br /><strong>Weighted factors in the carefully designed formula <br />include disk jockey plays, juke box activity and sales at <br />the retail level.</strong><br /><br />Again, they never really revealed to the public the exact <br />formula over the years, so we can only speculate.</td></tr></table> <br /><br />Probably wasn't one.  Until well into the 80s, few stations <br />outside of the major markets kept airplay logs...certainly <br />none of the stations I worked at did, and several were <br />reporting stations.  The PD/MD would submit a ranked list <br />of what we were playing once a week but that was it...there <br />was no way to tell if a given song got 5 plays or 50.  As a <br />jock I never had to keep track (other during BMI/ASCAP <br />reporting sweeps).<br /><br />If I'm not mistaken, it was more or less the same thing at <br />surveyed retailers.<br /><br />Only jukebox play had the ability to be accurately tracked.<br /><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by Hykker</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8317&amp;PID=43270&amp;title=billboard-hot-100-methogology-1958#43270</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Billboard HOT 100 Methogology 1958 :   Chatfan MA wrote:Nevertheless,...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8317&amp;PID=43268&amp;title=billboard-hot-100-methogology-1958#43268</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=38">Paul Haney</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 8317<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 13&nbsp;March&nbsp;2015 at 5:59am<br /><br /> <table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><img src="forum_images/quote_box.png" title="Originally posted by Chatfan MA" alt="Originally posted by Chatfan MA" style="vertical-align: text-bottom;" /> <strong>Chatfan MA wrote:</strong><br /><br />Nevertheless, does anyone have <br />Billboard's introduction issue of the HOT 100 from August <br />04, 1958 to see what was written there?</td></tr></table> <br /><br />Yes, I have the original article in front of me.  They don't give any specific ratios, but here's what they say:<br /><br /><strong>Weighted factors in the carefully designed formula include disk jockey plays, juke box activity and sales at the retail level.</strong><br /><br />Again, they never really revealed to the public the exact formula over the years, so we can only speculate.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 05:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8317&amp;PID=43268&amp;title=billboard-hot-100-methogology-1958#43268</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Billboard HOT 100 Methogology 1958 : I agree, times have changed and...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8317&amp;PID=43264&amp;title=billboard-hot-100-methogology-1958#43264</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=675">Chatfan MA</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 8317<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 12&nbsp;March&nbsp;2015 at 5:06pm<br /><br />I agree, times have changed and nowadays we know average <br />ratios of the HOT 100 .. interesting for maybe personal <br />calculations or not. Nevertheless, does anyone have <br />Billboard's introduction issue of the HOT 100 from August <br />04, 1958 to see what was written there?]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8317&amp;PID=43264&amp;title=billboard-hot-100-methogology-1958#43264</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Billboard HOT 100 Methogology 1958 :   Paul Haney wrote:Back in 1958,...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8317&amp;PID=43263&amp;title=billboard-hot-100-methogology-1958#43263</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=675">Chatfan MA</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 8317<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 12&nbsp;March&nbsp;2015 at 5:00pm<br /><br /> <table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><img src="forum_images/quote_box.png" title="Originally posted by Paul Haney" alt="Originally posted by Paul Haney" style="vertical-align: text-bottom;" /> <strong>Paul Haney wrote:</strong><br /><br />Back in 1958, there wasn't nearly the <br />interest in the "behind the scenes" workings of the <br />charts as there seems to be these days with the internet <br />and social media.  Until recently, Billboard was never <br />very forthcoming in the exact ratios used for the <br />different components of the Hot 100 over the years and <br />that was their prerogative.  The only sure-fire way I <br />know how to get the correct answers is to ask somebody <br />that actually worked in the chart department during <br />whichever era you're wondering about.  Of course, those <br />that were there from the 1950s-1970s are either long-<br />retired or dead, so we are left to speculate.  IMO, what <br />really matters are the actual chart positions and not how <br />they were put together, although I do admit that it would <br />be interesting to know for sure.</td></tr></table> ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8317&amp;PID=43263&amp;title=billboard-hot-100-methogology-1958#43263</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Billboard HOT 100 Methogology 1958 : Back in 1958, there wasn&amp;#039;t...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8317&amp;PID=43260&amp;title=billboard-hot-100-methogology-1958#43260</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=38">Paul Haney</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 8317<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 12&nbsp;March&nbsp;2015 at 6:37am<br /><br />Back in 1958, there wasn't nearly the interest in the "behind the scenes" workings of the charts as there seems to be these days with the internet and social media.  Until recently, Billboard was never very forthcoming in the exact ratios used for the different components of the Hot 100 over the years and that was their prerogative.  The only sure-fire way I know how to get the correct answers is to ask somebody that actually worked in the chart department during whichever era you're wondering about.  Of course, those that were there from the 1950s-1970s are either long-retired or dead, so we are left to speculate.  IMO, what really matters are the actual chart positions and not how they were put together, although I do admit that it would be interesting to know for sure.<span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by Paul Haney</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8317&amp;PID=43260&amp;title=billboard-hot-100-methogology-1958#43260</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Billboard HOT 100 Methogology 1958 : Dear Chartfans, among many interesting...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8317&amp;PID=43257&amp;title=billboard-hot-100-methogology-1958#43257</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=675">Chatfan MA</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 8317<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 11&nbsp;March&nbsp;2015 at 3:55pm<br /><br />Dear Chartfans, among many interesting facts and <br />discussions I have read here some posts on BB chat <br />methodologies. Nowadays the HOT 100 is a subject of <br />constant changes and BB kindly announces them with the <br />given ratios between sales, airplay and streaming <br />services. However, I never read something about the ratio <br />between sales and airplay at the time when the HOT 100 <br />was launched on Aug 04, 1958. Unfortunately there is no <br />copy of the BB magazine published in Google books for <br />that date. I hoped there would be some information on <br />this subject. Personally I assume there must have been a <br />ratio of 60% for sales (retail, including stores and juke <br />boxes) and 40% radio/DJ. Who knows more?&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=8317&amp;PID=43257&amp;title=billboard-hot-100-methogology-1958#43257</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>