<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Top 40 Music on CD Forum : Sounds of the 80s 1980-1982</title>
  <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; Top 40 Music on CD Forum : Chat Board  : Sounds of the 80s 1980-1982]]></description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:26:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=4472</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sounds of the 80s 1980-1982 : Four years after my last post...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=37056&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#37056</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=89">crapfromthepast</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4472<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 20&nbsp;March&nbsp;2013 at 5:26pm<br /><br />Four years after my last post on this song, and I owe a few <br />of you an apology.  Turns out that the version on <em>Sounds <br />Of The Eighties Vol. 14 1980-1982</em> <strong>does</strong> have a <br />burst of static on the intro, starting at the first snare <br />hit after the intro and lasting about two beats.  The <br />static sounds a little like a mistuned FM radio, not a <br />clicky sound.<br /><br />Somehow, I missed it the first time through...]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=37056&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#37056</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sounds of the 80s 1980-1982 : I&amp;#039;ll make this even MORE...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=28227&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#28227</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=635">NightAire</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4472<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 03&nbsp;November&nbsp;2010 at 10:08pm<br /><br />I'll make this even MORE complicated; as 995wlol said, this is easy since I'm not having to maintain the database.  ;-)<br /><br />I wish it indicated "45: early fade" or "45: edit" to distinguish when I can just knock off the last X-number of seconds (or minutes) vs where I'm going to have to go in and slice and dice the album version.<br /><br />...I know, I know, be thankful for what you've got!  I am...  but this WOULD be nice, at least for me.  :)<br /><br />Carry on,<span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by NightAire</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=28227&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#28227</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sounds of the 80s 1980-1982 : Owner Of A Loneloy Heart can be...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=20392&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#20392</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1">Pat Downey</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4472<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 05&nbsp;January&nbsp;2009 at 7:45am<br /><br />Owner Of A Loneloy Heart can be faded to generate the 45 version.  The additional lyrics occur after the 45 would have faded out.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=20392&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#20392</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sounds of the 80s 1980-1982 : Pat, if I understand you correctly,...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=20391&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#20391</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=19">EdisonLite</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4472<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 05&nbsp;January&nbsp;2009 at 12:17am<br /><br />Pat, if I understand you correctly, "Owner of a Lonely Heart" cannot be faded to the 45 because there are  words on the 45 that are different in the same spot on the LP (and thus, the new designation as "45 version"?)<br /><br />And we can't edit the LP to be the "45 version" because of these unique words?<span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by EdisonLite</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=20391&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#20391</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sounds of the 80s 1980-1982 : &amp;lt;however, you could argue that...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=20390&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#20390</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=19">EdisonLite</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4472<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 05&nbsp;January&nbsp;2009 at 12:13am<br /><br />&lt;however, you could argue that there is a key change at the end with different lyrics that are not on the 45 and thus should be a "version."&gt;<br /><br />Aaron and Pat - I'm confused about this. If there are different lyrics on the Yes "Owner" 45 that do not occur on the same spot on the LP, then this would definitely be an issue of "version" and not "length." Is that what happens on the 45? Or do you mean, there's a key change (i.e. a modulation) on the "album length" version AFTER the 45 would be over?<br /><br />And are you and Pat now saying that if after the 45 is over, the LP simply has repeating choruses it would be labeled as "length" but if there's another verse, i.e. different lyrics, then this qualifies for a "version" (even though the LP can be faded to 45)?<br /><br />WOW - this is SOOOO confusing. <br /><br />So ... if the LP can be faded to the 45 (what would normally constitue a "length" designation), it's supposed to be listed as a "version" IF any one of the following conditions happens:<br /><br />1) what follows on the LP has a key change<br />2) what follows on the LP is more than 1 minute long<br />3) what follows on the LP has a new vocalist (i.e. "We Are the World")<br />4) what follows on the LP has a new verse with different lyrics<br />BUT - if what follows on the LP is just more choruses, it's a "length"?<br /><br />And what do we do if what follows on the LP is ad libs (new words) that aren't a new verse and not on any previous choruses - what's that??<br /><br />WOW, wouldn't it just be a lot easier to state that if you can fade an LP to be the 45, it should just be labeled "45 length"?<span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by EdisonLite</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=20390&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#20390</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sounds of the 80s 1980-1982 : Aaron, thanks for pointing out...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=20389&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#20389</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1">Pat Downey</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4472<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 04&nbsp;January&nbsp;2009 at 9:20pm<br /><br />Aaron, thanks for pointing out the lyric change in the longer version of "Owner Of A Lonely Heart".  For that reason, I have changed the designation from LP length to LP version in the database.<br /><br />Originally as I recall, I used a criteria that would automatically warrant a "version" comment if there was 1 minute of additional music on the LP vs the 45.<br /><br />In the case of "Owner Of A Lonely Heart" even though there isn't a 1 minute difference of time, there is that additional lyric that warrants a "version" designation.<br /><br />If you come across any other circumstances similar to "Owner Of A Lonely Heart", point them out to me and I will change the designation.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=20389&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#20389</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sounds of the 80s 1980-1982 :   995wlol wrote:Personally, I...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=20345&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#20345</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=17">Todd Ireland</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4472<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 02&nbsp;January&nbsp;2009 at 4:19pm<br /><br /> <table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><img src="forum_images/quote_box.png" title="Originally posted by 995wlol" alt="Originally posted by 995wlol" style="vertical-align: text-bottom;" /> <strong>995wlol wrote:</strong><br /><br />Personally, I would love to see a third designation in addition to "45 version" and "45 length" called something like "45 mix."  This would tell me that I can neither fade nor edit the LP version to recreate the "single" version.</td></tr></table> <br /><br />Actually, Pat does use "45 mix" and "LP mix" notations in the database on occasion, such as for the Beatles' "Yesterday" and Badfinger's "Baby Blue".  These designations can also be tricky because many times the mix differences between a stereo LP and a mono 45, other than the obvious left-right channel panning, may not be easily noticeable to the casual listener.  For instance, a mono mix might consist of slightly louder vocals or feature certain instruments a little more prominently compared to its stereo counterpart.  As we delve deeper into more '60s Top 40 hits, I'm sure this issue will become front and center (no pun intended!) for many 45 and LP comparisons.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by Todd Ireland</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=20345&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#20345</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sounds of the 80s 1980-1982 : I think it&amp;#039;s one of those...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=20325&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#20325</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=32">aaronk</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4472<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 01&nbsp;January&nbsp;2009 at 2:57pm<br /><br />I think it's one of those things that would be too much work to go back and change at this point.  What bothers me is that there is not a rule that can be applied to determine "length" vs "version" for early fades.  Not having a rule also makes it very inconsistent.  For instance, "Owner Of A Lonely Heart" by Yes gets a "45 length" designation; however, you could argue that there is a key change at the end with different lyrics that are not on the 45 and thus should be a "version."]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 14:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=20325&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#20325</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sounds of the 80s 1980-1982 : I&amp;#039;ve probably read nearly...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=20322&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#20322</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=115">995wlol</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4472<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 01&nbsp;January&nbsp;2009 at 1:36pm<br /><br />I've probably read nearly all of the posts involving the "length" vs "version" argument, but haven't chimed in yet, so here I go.  It seems that there are quite a large number of forum members (myself included) that utilize audio editing software to create early fades and edits from LP versions already in their collections.  Due to this fact, it seems like the "45 length" designation would be much more useful to those members, regardless whether any lyrics or unique audio occur after the fade, which doesn't seem particularly important when tracking down a version since most people are already familiar with the given version they are searching for.  Personally, I would love to see a third designation in addition to "45 version" and "45 length" called something like "45 mix."  This would tell me that I can neither fade nor edit the LP version to recreate the "single" version.  Of course I know that this is easy for me to throw out there since I'm not the one maintaining the database :-)  Just my two cents.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 13:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=20322&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#20322</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sounds of the 80s 1980-1982 :   EdisonLite wrote:... do you...]]></title>
   <link>https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=20320&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#20320</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=32">aaronk</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4472<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 01&nbsp;January&nbsp;2009 at 1:10pm<br /><br /> <table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><img src="forum_images/quote_box.png" title="Originally posted by EdisonLite" alt="Originally posted by EdisonLite" style="vertical-align: text-bottom;" /> <strong>EdisonLite wrote:</strong><br /><br />... do you just randomly choose the designation and not have a specific time used as the dividing line, which is even more random?</td></tr></table> <br />We've argued this before, and I'm with you, Gordon.  It's very confusing when the database randomly chooses which early fades are considered "versions."  There are even instances in the database where a song fades only a matter of seconds earlier, but it still gets a "version" designation, because the full song ends cold.<br /><br />"We Are The World" is another example of an early fade that is designated as "version," because there are soloists that are not featured earlier in the song.  Again, it's very arbitrary, and there are no definite rules as to how the "length" and "version" designators are applied to early fades.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 13:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4472&amp;PID=20320&amp;title=sounds-of-the-80s-19801982#20320</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>