https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Thu, 23 Apr 2026 16:47:31 +0000 Sun, 21 Jul 2013 16:39:54 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.07 360 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1858 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum//images/Top-40-Music-on-CD-Forum-Logo.png https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/ https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=38578&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#38578 Author: edtop40
Subject: 1858
Posted: 21 July 2013 at 4:39pm

i just did an A/B review of simon & garfunkel's song
'bridge over troubled water' and there are very subtle mix
differences, but NOT enough to warrant a note in the
db......as i usually do, i will chalk this one up to the
innate differences between a stereo deliver of the music
and a mono delivery of the music....as far as i can tell
all the instrumentation are the same on mono mix and stereo
mix.......it's just that because of the format, they sound
different....i go back to what i always say.....when
comparing a stereo version of a song and a mono
version....they don't sound anything alike, because of the
natural differences in the delivery method...]]> Sun, 21 Jul 2013 16:39:54 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=38578&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#38578 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27172&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27172 Author: aaronk
Subject: 1858
Posted: 19 July 2010 at 7:37pm

Yah Shure wrote: I always thought the overpowering strings at the end of the song served as the perfect metaphor.

I KNEW someone was going to bring that up! I had thought about it myself, even as I was typing my response above. I'm not saying the dislike the mono version, but it's definitely not my preference. I suppose if I had become used to hearing that mix, it probably would be, though.]]> Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:37:06 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27172&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27172 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27166&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27166 Author: Yah Shure
Subject: 1858
Posted: 19 July 2010 at 6:00pm

I always thought the overpowering strings at the end of the song served as the perfect metaphor: that no matter how strong the currents of the troubled water were raging (and nearly drowning him) Art would still be there as that bridge. The dramatically-overpowering strings make me imagine that the bridge is over Niagara Falls instead of Cripple Creek.

Then again, the Niagara Falls tourism bureau may not have seen the potential humor in any "bride over troubled water" typos. So much for going over-the-top... :)

In any event, the 45 sounded great on AM radio at the time. But I certainly wouldn't say that the mono 45 is anything like a "mono Sgt. Peppers" compared to the stereo mix.

My promo 45 arrived at the college station on January 28, 1970, and the initial HOF reissue on September 30th, meaning that the original BOTW single was available for fewer than eight months. Of course, it sold a boatload during that time, but because of the length and high percentage of styrene pressings, pristine originals can be a tough find.

I was prepared to dig out my original stock, DJ and HOF copies to do a needledrop over the weekend, but the real surprise turned out to be a long-forgotten cutout copy I'd bought in 1970. Part of the fun of cutout 45s was that pressings from other regions of the country besides the usual suspects would often turn up. This particular cutout was an east coast Pitman styrene pressing which I had never played. I captured the virgin spin and it sounded fantastic. The previously-unplayed Terre Haute mono DJ side had more rumble and surface noise. I stopped right there and never even got to the Terre Haute HOF reissue copy.

Edited by Yah Shure]]> Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:00:15 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27166&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27166 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27165&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27165 Author: Roscoe
Subject: 1858
Posted: 19 July 2010 at 11:14am

aaronk wrote: Thanks to John, I just did a side-by-side comparison of the mono 45 and a fold down of the Essential version. This is one case where I'm going to have to disagree about a drastic difference between the two, even though the 45 is a unique mix. Perhaps earlier copies on CD suffer from extra reverb, but I do not hear any extra reverb on the stereo version. In fact, at the end, it's just the opposite. The 45 has the vocals buried and it sounds far more echo-y than the stereo fold down. I will also argue that the fold down sounds better than the actual 45, particularly at the end. The strings are cranked up way too loud, practically drowning everything else out.

I tend to agree that the mono BOTW is not a revelation. I do think it's a fine mono mix, but not orders of magnitude different or better than the stereo mix.

Still, I'm glad to have it. I believe I did my needledrop from a "Hall of Fame" reissue 45, which was vinyl and not styrene. I have read elsewhere that the HOF 45s pale in comparison to the Columbia originals, but I can never seem to find originals that are in good enough shape for a needledrop.]]> Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:14:01 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27165&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27165 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27158&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27158 Author: aaronk
Subject: 1858
Posted: 18 July 2010 at 8:58pm

Thanks to John, I just did a side-by-side comparison of the mono 45 and a fold down of the Essential version. This is one case where I'm going to have to disagree about a drastic difference between the two, even though the 45 is a unique mix. Perhaps earlier copies on CD suffer from extra reverb, but I do not hear any extra reverb on the stereo version. In fact, at the end, it's just the opposite. The 45 has the vocals buried and it sounds far more echo-y than the stereo fold down.

I will also argue that the fold down sounds better than the actual 45, particularly at the end. The strings are cranked up way too loud, practically drowning everything else out.]]> Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:58:43 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27158&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27158 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27154&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27154 Author: TomDiehl1
Subject: 1858
Posted: 18 July 2010 at 7:03pm

Many thanks to John for the 45 dub... it's been a long time since I've played the 45.

On a side note, hearing the mono mix again reminds me of my test pressing 45 for Garfunkel's All I Know, which has it's original sleeve with someone's (DJ, label worker, promotion man?) handwriting on it saying "this is the next Bridge Over Troubled Water". The test pressing had the longer "mono" version of the song on both sides, which I thought was pretty cool. ]]> Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:03:40 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27154&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27154 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27152&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27152 Author: Yah Shure
Subject: 1858
Posted: 18 July 2010 at 6:35pm

eriejwg wrote: To me, the 45 just blows the LP away.

The 45 blew me away, too, along with my Realistic bookshelf speakers from Radio Shack, which were definitely the weak link my 1969 stereo system. The pronounced bottom-end cacaphony on the "Bridge" mono 45 blew out the woofers time and time again during the two years that I used them. Good thing they came with a lifetime warranty! They've performed much better as plant stands in the ensuing years. :)

There is a speed difference between the stereo side of my DJ 45 and my commercial 45. The Terre Haute stereo DJ runs two seconds faster (4:52) than the Pitman mono commercial 45 (4:54).

One of the great things about the mono mix is the definitive climax at the moment when the violins stop playing at the end, followed by the decay. But the extra-helping of reverb on the stereo mix - including the DJ 45's stereo side - completely obliterates the impact of that same moment. ]]> Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:35:35 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27152&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27152 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27150&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27150 Author: eriejwg
Subject: 1858
Posted: 18 July 2010 at 5:32pm

My 45 is styrene. ]]> Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:32:30 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27150&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27150 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27147&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27147 Author: aaronk
Subject: 1858
Posted: 18 July 2010 at 6:33am

John, I'd love to hear what the mono 45 sounds like. Thanks!]]> Sun, 18 Jul 2010 06:33:03 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27147&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27147 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27146&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27146 Author: davidclark
Subject: 1858
Posted: 18 July 2010 at 3:45am

i'd LOVE an mp3 vinyl dub as well, eriejwg. I have recently become VERY
interested in collecting mono 45 versions. So different in sound, so many
are! thanks.]]> Sun, 18 Jul 2010 03:45:02 +0000 https://top40musiconcd.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1858&PID=27146&title=simon-garfunkelbridge-over#27146