Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: Neil Diamond-"Shilo" Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
jimct
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
Posted: 06 April 2007 at 4:08am | IP Logged Quote jimct

My 1970 commercial 45 release, which is mono, has a listed time of (3:43), but an actual time of (3:41). I post this because the only CD in the database stating it's the "hit single version" has a running time of (3:48), :07 longer than my 45. My 45 does feature a severe, quick, pretty horrible fade, which is probably not duplicated on that database CD. Since there's probably been more Neil Diamond inquiries on this Board than for any other pre-Madonna-era artist, I decided to pass these extra details along, for those who may be interested.
Back to Top View jimct's Profile Search for other posts by jimct
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3479
Posted: 30 January 2011 at 11:25am | IP Logged Quote eriejwg

Can someone give fade point times to replicate this, as Jim termed it, "severe fade" ?
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 
Yah Shure
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 11 December 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1315
Posted: 30 January 2011 at 1:51pm | IP Logged Quote Yah Shure

John, I'll shoot you a dub of my 45, which matches Jim's (3:41) actual playing time.
Back to Top View Yah Shure's Profile Search for other posts by Yah Shure
 
eriejwg
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 10 June 2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3479
Posted: 01 February 2011 at 10:23am | IP Logged Quote eriejwg

After listening to the dub of John's 45, the 45 is definitely drier than the hit single mix in stereo, which has slightly more reverb. Even when you convert the stereo track to mono, it's not as dry as the 45. IMHO.
Back to Top View eriejwg's Profile Search for other posts by eriejwg Visit eriejwg's Homepage
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0957 seconds.