Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: Osmonds - "Double Lovin’" Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
jimct
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 07 April 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3906
Posted: 28 May 2006 at 4:18am | IP Logged Quote jimct
Listed 45 time for both stock and promo is (2:30); both my copies definitely go to (2:35). The "version police" might wanna give this 45 a listen to see if it's the same mix as the stereo (2:32) CD versions; I have my doubts.
Back to Top View jimct's Profile Search for other posts by jimct
 
Grant
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 12 October 2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 211
Posted: 28 May 2006 at 2:53pm | IP Logged Quote Grant
The stereo and mono mixes are different. The vocals are a bit louder on the mono single, and the horns are lower. The mono single is a bit drier, too.
Back to Top View Grant's Profile Search for other posts by Grant
 
edtop40
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 29 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4992
Posted: 11 August 2012 at 4:12pm | IP Logged Quote edtop40
i just A/B'ed the vinyl 45 to the best of cd and they're
the same except for the mono/stereo differences.....in my
opinion, just because drums are more upfront or horns are
blended back, if all the instrumentation is identical and
nothing is omitted or altered, i will always chalk it up to
the inherent mono stereo mixing differences and that they
are the same, except the mono 45 does run 0:02 longer (2:33
vrs 2:35)

__________________
edtop40
Back to Top View edtop40's Profile Search for other posts by edtop40
 
Todd Ireland
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4218
Posted: 11 August 2012 at 9:19pm | IP Logged Quote Todd Ireland
edtop40 wrote:
...in my opinion, just because drums are more upfront or horns are blended back, if all the instrumentation is identical and nothing is omitted or altered, i will always chalk it up to the inherent mono stereo mixing differences and that they are the same, except the mono 45 does run 0:02 longer (2:33 vrs 2:35)


I can't recall if this has been discussed elsewhere on the message board, but I've long wondered when a mix difference(s) between a mono 45 and stereo LP is considered significant enough to warrant a "45 mix" or "LP mix" comment? I'm not clear as to whether this distinction is made only when echo or reverb is added to one of the mixes, or if it also applies in cases where vocals or instruments are panned way up or way down from one mix to the other. (And even in the latter situation, how much of a volume difference would officially qualify as a mix difference?) If Pat has specific criteria in determining when to use "45/LP mix" comments in the database, I'd very much be interested in obtaining some clarification on this.

Edited by Todd Ireland on 11 August 2012 at 9:23pm
Back to Top View Todd Ireland's Profile Search for other posts by Todd Ireland
 
Pat Downey
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 01 October 2003
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1738
Posted: 12 August 2012 at 9:57am | IP Logged Quote Pat Downey
It is all subjective Todd.
Back to Top View Pat Downey's Profile Search for other posts by Pat Downey
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0781 seconds.