![]() |
Little Richard - Good Golly Miss Molly |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
Ringmaster_D
Music Fan
Joined: 08 July 2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Little Richard - Good Golly Miss MollyPosted: 07 August 2022 at 5:02pm |
|
The vocal on this song is dry on the 45. Watch out for
versions with added reverb, such as on The Georgia Peach LP. |
|
![]() |
|
mjb50
Music Fan
Joined: 28 April 2021 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 49 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 August 2022 at 6:06pm |
![]() |
|
TomDiehl1
Music Fan
Joined: 13 January 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 August 2022 at 2:33am |
|
It may have been dry on later pressings of
the 45. |
|
|
Live in stereo.
|
|
![]() |
|
crapfromthepast
Music Fan
Joined: 14 September 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 160 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 August 2022 at 10:57am |
|
Just some mastering info.
Of the CDs I have, I found four different analog transfers for the 1958 hit version of "Good Golly Miss Molly", which is in mono. (Stereo and fake stereo versions on CD are non-hit rerecordings.) The first is on Rhino's Little Richard collection 18 Greatest Hits (1985). Sounds is OK, but not terrific. This collection likely didn't use the lowest-generation tape sources out there. Plus, I hear a little bit of stereo reverb on the vocals (it shows up in a null test; my ears aren't that good). The same analog transfer is used on:
There's also a dreadful rerecording on Motown's Compact Command Performances 15 Greatest Hits (1986), which also has terrible sound. Avoid Little Richard on Motown. My recommendation Seek out Time-Life's Rock 'N' Roll Era Vol. 5 1958 RE-2 reissue (1992). |
|
|
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
|
|
![]() |
|
vanmeter
Music Fan
Joined: 28 December 2005 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 August 2022 at 6:21pm |
This is essentially what my original 45 sounds like as well, definitely not dry, although the reverb is subtle. Edited by vanmeter |
|
![]() |
|
Paul C
Music Fan
Joined: 23 October 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 28 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 August 2022 at 8:17am |
Does the label on your copy state "From the Specialty LP, "Little Richard's Grooviest 17 Original Hits"? If so, then you have a later pressing, since this album was not issued until 1968. Discogs incorrectly lists this pressing as being from 1958. (It in fact cannot be from earlier than 1968): https://www.discogs.com/release/14342328-Little-Richard- Good-Golly-Miss-Molly-Hey-Hey-Hey-Hey |
|
![]() |
|
TomDiehl1
Music Fan
Joined: 13 January 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 August 2022 at 6:00pm |
|
Easy enough to change the year, so I have
done so. |
|
|
Live in stereo.
|
|
![]() |
|
Ringmaster_D
Music Fan
Joined: 08 July 2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 August 2022 at 2:27pm |
Yes, I should have said "fairly dry." There is indeed some reverb in there, but nothing like the cavernous verb on some sources. For the record, I'm using the MFSL re- release of Here's Little Richard as my go to source. |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |