Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Chat Board
 Top 40 Music on Compact Disc : Chat Board
Subject Topic: "If I Can’t Have You" - Yvonne Elliman Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Todd Ireland
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 16 October 2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4217
Posted: 03 June 2009 at 3:12pm | IP Logged Quote Todd Ireland

The actual commercial 45 run time of Yvonne Elliman's "If I Can't Have You" is 2:56. (Timing info courtesy of Jim. The printed record label time is 2:57.) I only post this because the song's database CDs (except for the promo "Special Disco Version" appearances) run 2:53-2:58.
Back to Top View Todd Ireland's Profile Search for other posts by Todd Ireland
 
crapfromthepast
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 14 September 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2188
Posted: 22 April 2015 at 8:25pm | IP Logged Quote crapfromthepast

The needledrop of the 45 that I have runs at 109.1 BPM throughout (it's a live drummer playing to a click track), and fades from about 2:47 to about 2:57.

The first CD that featured the song is Silver Eagle/Warner Special Products' 2-CD Dancin' The Night Away (1988), where it runs at 109.5 BPM throughout. It sounds like it's from a very high-generation tape source, with very little high end and very little stereo separation. The same analog transfer is used for:
  • Priority's Mega-Hits Dance Classics Vol. 3 (1989; the last 30 seconds of the song are louder than the rest of the song, and clip a bit)
Also in 1988, a 5-CD set on Connoisseur Collection called 100 Dance Hits Of The '70s featured the song, running a bit slower at 108.5 BPM throughout, and the same fade points as the 45. This version sounds like it's from better source tapes, but with a boosted high end and a boosted low end.

The versions on Saturday Night Fever (both original and 1995 remaster) run 109.3 BPM throughout, and sound surprisingly similar to each other. Not the lowest-generation source tapes. The same analog transfer is used for :
  • Razor & Tie's 2-CD Disco Fever (1991)
Bill Inglot did a new analog transfer for Rhino's Billboard Top Hits 1978 (1991), which runs 109.6 BPM throughout, and sounds WAY better than anything else that came before or after, to my ears. The same analog transfer is used for:
  • Time-Life's AM Gold Vol. 25 1978 (1997; digitally exactly 1.5 dB quieter)
  • Time-Life's Sounds Of The Seventies Vol. 46 '70s Dance Party 1978-1979 (1997; differently-EQ'd digital clone)
  • Time-Life's 2-CD Seventies Music Explosion Vol. 2 Escape (2005)
Others, which all seem to be different analog transfers from one another:
  • Time-Life's Sounds Of The Seventies Vol. 27 Dance Fever (1992) runs at 108.8 BPM throughout, and has no high end.
  • Sessions/Warner Special Products' 2-CD The Ultimate Party Album (1992) runs at 108.7 BPM throughout, and has no high end.
  • Sony's Collector's Edition Disco (1995) runs at 109.2 BPM throughout, and has a wimpy-sounding EQ.
  • Polydor's Pure Disco (1996) begins its fade too early and ends its fade a few seconds too soon.
My recommendations:

This one is clear - go with Rhino's Billboard Top Hits 1978 (1991), or one of its Time-Life clones.

Edited by crapfromthepast on 23 April 2015 at 7:01am


__________________
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
Back to Top View crapfromthepast's Profile Search for other posts by crapfromthepast Visit crapfromthepast's Homepage
 
Ron S
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 04 July 2018
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 193
Posted: 27 July 2018 at 4:26pm | IP Logged Quote Ron S

What about the 20th Century Masters? How is the sound on it and does it
match the 45?
Back to Top View Ron S's Profile Search for other posts by Ron S
 
crapfromthepast
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 14 September 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2188
Posted: 27 July 2018 at 8:52pm | IP Logged Quote crapfromthepast

Will gladly take a look at this if someone shoots me a WAV file...

__________________
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
Back to Top View crapfromthepast's Profile Search for other posts by crapfromthepast Visit crapfromthepast's Homepage
 
davidclark
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 17 November 2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1077
Posted: 02 August 2018 at 9:46am | IP Logged Quote davidclark

I have it from Taragon's "The Very Best Of Yvonne Elliman" (1995)
and it sounds good. Haven't compared it to your "best" though.

__________________
dc1
Back to Top View davidclark's Profile Search for other posts by davidclark
 
Bill Cahill
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 27 June 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 591
Posted: 10 August 2018 at 4:53am | IP Logged Quote Bill Cahill

The click track might what's heard (on EVERY issue of this song) at :16 off to one channel where there is
an audible click. . Also, I don't hear a mix difference on the "Special Disco Version", it sounds like
it's just edited to repeat some of the song to make it longer, but is different in that it sounds as if it
has less compression/limiting than the 2:56 version. So I suppose you could edit it back to 2:56 to get a
less compressed/limited verson of the 2:56 version. But I don't think that gives you any real improvement
on the Billboard CD transfer.

Edited by Bill Cahill on 10 August 2018 at 4:55am
Back to Top View Bill Cahill's Profile Search for other posts by Bill Cahill
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6428
Posted: 10 August 2018 at 8:40am | IP Logged Quote aaronk

I agree, Bill. The Special Disco Version is just looped/edited. They did the same thing with "Night Fever" on that LP. The other three tracks on the Saturday Night Fever promo do have mix differences (Stayin' Alive, You Should Be Dancing, More Than A Woman).

__________________
Aaron Kannowski
Uptown Sound
91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
AndrewChouffi
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 24 September 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1060
Posted: 10 August 2018 at 9:07am | IP Logged Quote AndrewChouffi

To AaronK:

I *believe* there are no MIX differences on "You Should Be Dancing", but it is the longer unedited take of the track that made it to 'Children Of The World' & 'Saturday Night Fever Soundtrack'.

The first known appearance of this version (to the best of my knowledge) was the US promo 12" issued to the discos right before the 'Children Of The World' LP dropped.

People, please correct me if I'm wrong!

Andy



Edited by AndrewChouffi on 11 August 2018 at 6:14am
Back to Top View AndrewChouffi's Profile Search for other posts by AndrewChouffi
 
aaronk
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6428
Posted: 10 August 2018 at 9:54am | IP Logged Quote aaronk

Andy, that's probably correct. I knew that it was longer than the LP
version, but you're probably right that the mix is the same. My post
above should probably read that those three tracks are not looped like
the other two.

__________________
Aaron Kannowski
Uptown Sound
91.9 The Peak - Classic Hip Hop
Back to Top View aaronk's Profile Search for other posts by aaronk Visit aaronk's Homepage
 
KentT
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 25 May 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 650
Posted: 10 August 2018 at 2:02pm | IP Logged Quote KentT

First CD appearance, by the way is the RSO CD of the
"Saturday Night Fever" soundtrack in 1983-1984. The old 2
CD fatboy case version, later versions were on Polydor.

__________________
I turn up the good and turn down the bad!
Back to Top View KentT's Profile Search for other posts by KentT
 
crapfromthepast
MusicFan
MusicFan


Joined: 14 September 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2188
Posted: 15 August 2018 at 8:54pm | IP Logged Quote crapfromthepast

Ron S wrote:
What about the 20th Century Masters? How is the sound on it and does it match the 45?


I got to finally check out the 20th Century Masters version. The EQ is a little bass-heavy, and the balance is off so that the left channel is noticeably louder than the right channel. Dynamic range is good, no noise reduction, but I think it may be from some high-generation source tapes. It runs at 109.5 BPM, for what it's worth.

I still prefer the Billboard disc.


__________________
There's a lot of crap on the radio, but there's only one Crap From The Past.
Back to Top View crapfromthepast's Profile Search for other posts by crapfromthepast Visit crapfromthepast's Homepage
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 0.0967 seconds.