![]() |
Jaggerz - The Rapper |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | |
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 138 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 16 June 2006 at 11:15pm |
Pat suggested we start a new thread on this one, and since Tom brings some new info to the table, I'll be the one to start it :)
In the "CD mastering flaws" thread, Tom D says that his stock and promo 45s of Jaggerz "The Rapper" does not have the echo at 1:47 & 1:56. Jim mentions in a different thread that his stock 45 does have the "caw caw caw" reverb at these points in the song. So, perhaps there is more than one mono mix floating around? |
|
![]() |
|
jimct ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Pat & Aaron: I have two stock copies of "The Rapper." BOTH have "caw-caw-caw" after the "coffee or tea or me" line, for 4 seconds, between 1:46 and 1:50. I would be happy to donate one of them to Pat (I'd LOVE to find a stock 45 WITHOUT that annoyance!) Deadwax on both of my 45s are simply "KA 502 A". Or I can forward a vinyl dub to Aaron for "research" purposes. I have NEVER been able to find a promo 45 for it, and I have looked hard. But I never heard the "caw-caw-caw" on radio in 1970, so I'd suspect it's not found there. I believe a previous poster stated that.
|
|
![]() |
|
TomDiehl1 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 13 January 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Deadwax on my promo copy? KA 502 A. Other dead wax markings: machine stamped "Sterling", handwritten letters LH right after it. I can also make out faintly machine stamped letter P on one side of the dead wax and the number 3 on the other side of the dead wax, also machine stamped. These markings (and sound recording) matched the stock copy i had (but my promo with the Sterling machine stamp is on polystyrene while my old stock copy was on vinyl and i dont remember it having Sterling in the trail out) but I no longer have that stock 45 as i got rid of it when i aquired the promotional copy (or it might be sitting in a box of 45s waiting to be disposed of...ill go through that box and update this post if i find that i still have that copy). On my promo, placement of the writings in the dead wax according to my picture below are as follows: KA 502 A is at 9:00, the letter P is at 10:00, the number 3 is at about 4:00, and STERLING is at about 6:30 (lol). If you make the image bigger, i think you can see some of the markings, both my 45 and scanner were dirty so some of that shows up in the picture too. I ripped my promo 45 and put it on my Angelfire website. Angelfire doesnt allow hotlinking so you need to right click and save the file to your computer in order to hear it. Clicking on the file normally will give you an error message: http://www.angelfire.com/md3/tomdiehl1/Jaggerz-TheRapper-pro mo.mp3 ![]() Edited by TomDiehl1 |
|
Live in stereo.
|
|
![]() |
|
Pat Downey ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 01 October 2003 Status: Offline Points: 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for starting a new thread on this topic. Looks to me like there is enough evidence of 2 different 45 pressings to warrant an entry in the database so I'll add it!
|
|
![]() |
|
jimct ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 07 April 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tom said: "KA 502 A is at 9:00, the letter P is at 10:00, the number 3 is at about 4:00, and STERLING is at about 6:30." I knew I should've paid more attention in my Forensic Science class in college! Especially with a guy with his own TV show, Dr. Henry Lee, teaching me! I see ALL the markings Tom has specified on my stock 45. The "P" is at 10:00, but the "3" is at 3 o'clock, not "4", and the "STERLING" with LH written in is at more like "4:30", not "6:30", for what it's worth. I just listened to Tom's download - it is ABSOLUTELY not what is on my 2 stock 45s. Great job, Tom!
Edited by jimct |
|
![]() |
|
TomDiehl1 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 13 January 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I just got a Canadian pressing of the 45. It has the same version as my promo 45, oddly the ONLY marking in the trail out on the Rapper side is KA-502-S1 (it plays in mono so the S1 must mean side 1). Therefore a different laquer had to have been made for it, my guess is this is the version that was supposed to be released. I had another friend check his version of the single and it ended up being the same as mine.
|
|
Live in stereo.
|
|
![]() |
|
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 138 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Since we now know that two 45 versions exist---one with the echo and one without---should we eliminate the "LP version" comments for all stereo copies? Were there other differences between the 45 and LP versions, aside from the echo? If not, that would mean the stereo LP version is the same as one of the 45 versions (except the mono/stereo difference).
|
|
![]() |
|
TomDiehl1 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 13 January 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Aside from the echo and other mixing differences, they are the exact same take. i didnt hear any additional or less instrumentation in one or the other when playing them side by side, just very different sounding mixes. On the stereo mix that I have, though, at the very end where the clapping is and you hear "thank you, thank you very much, love you (or 'thank you' again, i cant tell)" that spoken part is very faint, however it can be heard clearly on the mono mix from my promo 45 (mp3 should still be at that link for downloading).
However, for all practical purposes, the stereo version is the correct single version. i dont know why that other single version exists, but apparently it was a limited thing, maybe a west coast vs east coast thing? Edited by TomDiehl1 |
|
Live in stereo.
|
|
![]() |
|
aaronk ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 16 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 138 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks, Tom! I had already decided that the stereo version was the only one on CD worth having. The mono mixes currently available on disc sound muddy, most likely because the tape heads weren't aligned properly. By contrast, the mono mix on the vinyl 45 sounds crisp and clean.
|
|
![]() |
|
TomDiehl1 ![]() Music Fan ![]() Joined: 13 January 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Resurrecting an aincent thread....here's an interesting twist....
I was given a copy of a reissue 45 of The Rapper backed with I Call My Baby Candy. It's on Buddah BG 19, i assume BG means Buddah Gold....it has a given label time of 2:42 but actually runs 2:38. I see my above link for the promo version doesn't seem to work anymore so I can't re-download it for timing purposes but I did a raw rip of the stock copy Jim sent me with the added echo and it timed out to 2:40. The mastering on the reissue is definitely different, it didn't come from the original stamper...the reissue sounds a lot muddier, the original 45 has a hotter mix, also. The reissue 45 has a 1984 copyright as well, and I would assume all reissues were like it, for anyone who wants to try to find this odd version on vinyl (or rather styrene) easily...matrix in the dead wax says BG 19A followed by FW and what appears to be an O with a line through the top of it..... I find it odd that the reissue sounds very muddy, they must have lost the original master and this must have come from a copy which must be the only one they held on to as this version on cd sounds quite muddy too. |
|
Live in stereo.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |